Academic mentoring for university students with Specific Educational Needs (SEN): current challenges*1,2

Abstract The development of inclusive affirmative policies has stimulated debate and reflection on the enrollment rates of groups considered vulnerable in universities, with an intersectional approach to the topic. This text aims to describe and analyze the challenges of the mentoring work provided by the Pedagogical Support and Inclusion Center (NAPI) to university students with specific educational needs (SEN) who identify as having disabilities, at a university in the interior of São Paulo state. The services were offered remotely, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, following the initial protocol for verifying specific support and retention needs to monitor the students’ academic progress. Data collection was carried out through an analysis of written records by mentors and notes from field diaries documenting the support provided to students with SEN. The collected material was analyzed based on the theoretical and methodological assumptions of Aguiar and Ozella’s Signification Framework. The data was grouped into three main themes: 1) Review of the term SEN in the university’s institutional policies; 2) Didactic-pedagogical strategies used in the classroom setting; and 3) Challenges reported by the mentors regarding their duties in the program. The results highlighted aspects of the contributions of mentoring work to the development of the individuals involved, aligning with the university’s inclusive institutional policies. However, the adoption of an intersectional perspective in the observed practice led to an evolution in the analyzed policies and literature, pointing to a transformative process in inclusive practices at the university.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educação e Pesquisa
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202551282593en
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evasion and Academic Success Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic mentoring for university students with Specific Educational Needs (SEN): current challenges*1,2

Danielle dos Santos Cutrim Garros, Sandra Eli Sartoreto de Oliveira Martins, Aila Narene Dahwache Criado Rocha, Naiara dos Anjos de Oliveira
1 citations
Educação e Pesquisa
Evasion and Academic Success Factors
5.59
article

Academic mentoring for university students with Specific Educational Needs (SEN): current challenges*1,2

Danielle dos Santos Cutrim Garros, Sandra Eli Sartoreto de Oliveira Martins, Aila Narene Dahwache Criado Rocha, Naiara dos Anjos de Oliveira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The development of inclusive affirmative policies has stimulated debate and reflection on the enrollment rates of groups considered vulnerable in universities, with an intersectional approach to the topic. This text aims to describe and analyze the challenges of the mentoring work provided by the Pedagogical Support and Inclusion Center (NAPI) to university students with specific educational needs (SEN) who identify as having disabilities, at a university in the interior of São Paulo state. The services were offered remotely, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, following the initial protocol for verifying specific support and retention needs to monitor the students’ academic progress. Data collection was carried out through an analysis of written records by mentors and notes from field diaries documenting the support provided to students with SEN. The collected material was analyzed based on the theoretical and methodological assumptions of Aguiar and Ozella’s Signification Framework. The data was grouped into three main themes: 1) Review of the term SEN in the university’s institutional policies; 2) Didactic-pedagogical strategies used in the classroom setting; and 3) Challenges reported by the mentors regarding their duties in the program. The results highlighted aspects of the contributions of mentoring work to the development of the individuals involved, aligning with the university’s inclusive institutional policies. However, the adoption of an intersectional perspective in the observed practice led to an evolution in the analyzed policies and literature, pointing to a transformative process in inclusive practices at the university.

Educação e PesquisaVol. 51
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Estadual Paulista
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Evasion and Academic Success Factors
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.