Quantifying the benefit of load uncertainty reduction for the design of district energy systems under grid constraints using the value of information

Load uncertainty must be accounted for during design to ensure building energy systems can meet energy demands during operation. Reducing building load uncertainty allows for improved designs with less compromise to be identified, reducing the cost of decarbonizing energy usage. However, the building monitoring required to reduce load uncertainty is costly. This study quantifies the economic benefit of practical building monitoring for supporting energy system design decisions, to determine if its benefits outweigh its cost. It uses an extension of the Value of Information analysis (VoI) framework, called ‘On-Policy’ VoI, which analyses the benefit of uncertainty reduction for complex decision making tasks where decision policies are required. This is applied to a case study district energy system design problem, where a Linear Program model is used to size solar-battery systems and grid connection capacity under uncertain building loads, modelled using historic electricity metering data. Load uncertainty is found to significantly impact both system operating costs ( ± 30 % ) and the optimal system design ( ± 20 % ). However, using building monitoring data to improve the design of the district reduces overall costs by less than 1.5 % on average. As this is less than the cost of measurement, using monitoring is not economically worthwhile in this case. This provides the first numerical evidence to support the sufficiency of using standard building load profiles for energy system design. Further, reducing only uncertainty in mean load is found to provide most of the available decision support benefit, meaning using hourly measurement data provides little benefit for energy retrofit design. • Sizing of solar-battery and grid capacity in case study district with historical data. • Benefit of load uncertainty reduction for supporting energy system design quantified. • Building monitoring reduces total system costs by less than 1.5 % on average. • Monitoring is found to be not economically worthwhile for supporting system design. • Reducing only mean load uncertainty provides majority of decision support benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126549
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the benefit of load uncertainty reduction for the design of district energy systems under grid constraints using the value of information

Ruchi Choudhary, Max Langtry
1 citations
Applied Energy
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
article

Quantifying the benefit of load uncertainty reduction for the design of district energy systems under grid constraints using the value of information

Ruchi Choudhary, Max Langtry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Load uncertainty must be accounted for during design to ensure building energy systems can meet energy demands during operation. Reducing building load uncertainty allows for improved designs with less compromise to be identified, reducing the cost of decarbonizing energy usage. However, the building monitoring required to reduce load uncertainty is costly. This study quantifies the economic benefit of practical building monitoring for supporting energy system design decisions, to determine if its benefits outweigh its cost. It uses an extension of the Value of Information analysis (VoI) framework, called ‘On-Policy’ VoI, which analyses the benefit of uncertainty reduction for complex decision making tasks where decision policies are required. This is applied to a case study district energy system design problem, where a Linear Program model is used to size solar-battery systems and grid connection capacity under uncertain building loads, modelled using historic electricity metering data. Load uncertainty is found to significantly impact both system operating costs ( ± 30 % ) and the optimal system design ( ± 20 % ). However, using building monitoring data to improve the design of the district reduces overall costs by less than 1.5 % on average. As this is less than the cost of measurement, using monitoring is not economically worthwhile in this case. This provides the first numerical evidence to support the sufficiency of using standard building load profiles for energy system design. Further, reducing only uncertainty in mean load is found to provide most of the available decision support benefit, meaning using hourly measurement data provides little benefit for energy retrofit design. • Sizing of solar-battery and grid capacity in case study district with historical data. • Benefit of load uncertainty reduction for supporting energy system design quantified. • Building monitoring reduces total system costs by less than 1.5 % on average. • Monitoring is found to be not economically worthwhile for supporting system design. • Reducing only mean load uncertainty provides majority of decision support benefit.

Applied EnergyVol. 400
Turing Institute (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), British Library (GB), The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.