Transitions in Levels of Organization: Lessons from Social and Colonial Spiders

In the origin of multicellular organisms or social groups, a dichotomy emerges between systems where the parts retain some autonomy, referred to as modular, and more integrated unitary systems. I explore the critical roles of ecology and geometry in determining whether groups form and the degree of integration they develop. I argue that these are essential considerations above and beyond whether groups originate from a single cell or a single inseminated female. I consider these points through the lens of social and colonial spiders, which represent early transitions to either unitary or modular systems, respectively. By allowing or constraining cooperation, I suggest that the geometry of their webs—irregular tridimensional versus orbicular—determines the degree of integration of their groups, their scaling properties, their population structure, and their long-term evolutionary fate. Ecology, on the other hand, determines the need or opportunity for groups to form. I extend these lessons to other social systems and levels of organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102723-054147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transitions in Levels of Organization: Lessons from Social and Colonial Spiders

Leticia Avilés
1 citations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
11.35
article

Transitions in Levels of Organization: Lessons from Social and Colonial Spiders

Leticia Avilés
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the origin of multicellular organisms or social groups, a dichotomy emerges between systems where the parts retain some autonomy, referred to as modular, and more integrated unitary systems. I explore the critical roles of ecology and geometry in determining whether groups form and the degree of integration they develop. I argue that these are essential considerations above and beyond whether groups originate from a single cell or a single inseminated female. I consider these points through the lens of social and colonial spiders, which represent early transitions to either unitary or modular systems, respectively. By allowing or constraining cooperation, I suggest that the geometry of their webs—irregular tridimensional versus orbicular—determines the degree of integration of their groups, their scaling properties, their population structure, and their long-term evolutionary fate. Ecology, on the other hand, determines the need or opportunity for groups to form. I extend these lessons to other social systems and levels of organization.

Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and SystematicsVol. 56(1)
University of British Columbia Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global and Cross-Cultural Management
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.