In-silo federated learning vs. centralized learning for segmenting acute and chronic ischemic brain lesions

To investigate the efficacy of federated learning (FL) compared to industry-level centralized learning (CL) for segmenting acute infarct and white matter hyperintensity. This retrospective study included 13,546 diffusion-weighted images (DWI) from 10 hospitals and 8421 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images from 9 hospitals for acute (Task I) and chronic (Task II) lesion segmentation. We trained with datasets originated from 9 and 3 institutions for Task I and Task II, respectively, and externally tested them in datasets originated from 1 and 6 institutions each. For FL, the central server aggregated training results every four rounds with FedYogi (Task I) and FedAvg (Task II). A batch clipping strategy was tested for the FL models. Performances were evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The mean ages (SD) for the training datasets were 68.1 (12.8) for Task I and 67.4 (13.0) for Task II. The frequency of male participants was 51.5 % and 60.4 %, respectively. In Task I, the FL model employing batch clipping trained for 360 epochs achieved a DSC of 0.754 ± 0.183, surpassing an equivalently trained CL model (DSC 0.691 ± 0.229; p < 0.001) and comparable to the best-performing CL model at 940 epochs (DSC 0.755 ± 0.207; p = 0.701). In Task II, no significant differences were observed amongst FL model with clipping, without clipping, and CL model after 48 epochs (DSCs of 0.761 ± 0.299, 0.751 ± 0.304, 0.744 ± 0.304). Few-shot FL showed significantly lower performance. Task II reduced training times with batch clipping (3.5–1.75 h). Comparisons between CL and FL in identical settings suggest the feasibility of FL for medical image segmentation. • Federated learning models in acute and chronic brain lesions segmentation. • Federated learning reached comparable values to centralized learning models. • Limiting number of batches per federated client increased training efficiency. Summary Statement: A proof-of-concept study exhibits the competitiveness of federated learning models in acute and chronic brain lesions segmentation tasks compared to their centralized learning counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligence-Based Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100283
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-silo federated learning vs. centralized learning for segmenting acute and chronic ischemic brain lesions

Wi‐Sun Ryu, Myung-Jae Lee, Hoyeon Lee, Chi Kyung Kim et al.
2 citations
Intelligence-Based Medicine
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
1.68
article

In-silo federated learning vs. centralized learning for segmenting acute and chronic ischemic brain lesions

Wi‐Sun Ryu, Myung-Jae Lee, Hoyeon Lee, Chi Kyung Kim, Leonard Sunwoo, Joon Kim, Jong-Hyeok Park, Sang Hyun Park, Beom Joon Kim, Dong-Eog Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of federated learning (FL) compared to industry-level centralized learning (CL) for segmenting acute infarct and white matter hyperintensity. This retrospective study included 13,546 diffusion-weighted images (DWI) from 10 hospitals and 8421 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images from 9 hospitals for acute (Task I) and chronic (Task II) lesion segmentation. We trained with datasets originated from 9 and 3 institutions for Task I and Task II, respectively, and externally tested them in datasets originated from 1 and 6 institutions each. For FL, the central server aggregated training results every four rounds with FedYogi (Task I) and FedAvg (Task II). A batch clipping strategy was tested for the FL models. Performances were evaluated with the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The mean ages (SD) for the training datasets were 68.1 (12.8) for Task I and 67.4 (13.0) for Task II. The frequency of male participants was 51.5 % and 60.4 %, respectively. In Task I, the FL model employing batch clipping trained for 360 epochs achieved a DSC of 0.754 ± 0.183, surpassing an equivalently trained CL model (DSC 0.691 ± 0.229; p < 0.001) and comparable to the best-performing CL model at 940 epochs (DSC 0.755 ± 0.207; p = 0.701). In Task II, no significant differences were observed amongst FL model with clipping, without clipping, and CL model after 48 epochs (DSCs of 0.761 ± 0.299, 0.751 ± 0.304, 0.744 ± 0.304). Few-shot FL showed significantly lower performance. Task II reduced training times with batch clipping (3.5–1.75 h). Comparisons between CL and FL in identical settings suggest the feasibility of FL for medical image segmentation. • Federated learning models in acute and chronic brain lesions segmentation. • Federated learning reached comparable values to centralized learning models. • Limiting number of batches per federated client increased training efficiency. Summary Statement: A proof-of-concept study exhibits the competitiveness of federated learning models in acute and chronic brain lesions segmentation tasks compared to their centralized learning counterparts.

Intelligence-Based MedicineVol. 12
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (KR), Korea University Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital (KR), Korea University (JP), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Korea Medical Device Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.