Comparative analysis of blasting quality under different charging methods in waterlogged conditions (on the example of the Pervorechenskoye andesite deposit)

The application of emulsion explosive in the development of deposits by drilling and blasting method in the Primorsky Krai is considered. Special attention is paid to the methods of charging this substance, their efficiency and influence on the quality of drilling and blasting operations on the day surface. The methods of charging wells are described, including mechanized, using a mixing and charging machine, and manual. Features of each method, their advantages and disadvantages, influence on the final result of drilling and blasting works are discussed. A comparative analysis of the quality of blasting at manual and mechanized charging of watered holes in open pit mining operations is carried out. The results of research can be useful in the practical activities of mining enterprises, in scientific developments aimed at improving the technology of drilling and blasting operations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56195/20793332-2025-25-2-12-18
Primary Topic
Mining and Gasification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of blasting quality under different charging methods in waterlogged conditions (on the example of the Pervorechenskoye andesite deposit)

Yu.A. Vasyanovich, А. R. Tukhbatulin
Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use
Mining and Gasification Technologies
article

Comparative analysis of blasting quality under different charging methods in waterlogged conditions (on the example of the Pervorechenskoye andesite deposit)

Yu.A. Vasyanovich, А. R. Tukhbatulin
article en

Abstract

The application of emulsion explosive in the development of deposits by drilling and blasting method in the Primorsky Krai is considered. Special attention is paid to the methods of charging this substance, their efficiency and influence on the quality of drilling and blasting operations on the day surface. The methods of charging wells are described, including mechanized, using a mixing and charging machine, and manual. Features of each method, their advantages and disadvantages, influence on the final result of drilling and blasting works are discussed. A comparative analysis of the quality of blasting at manual and mechanized charging of watered holes in open pit mining operations is carried out. The results of research can be useful in the practical activities of mining enterprises, in scientific developments aimed at improving the technology of drilling and blasting operations.

Mine Surveying and Subsurface UseVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mining and Gasification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of blasting quality under different charging methods in waterlogged conditions (on the example of the Pervorechenskoye andesite deposit) — Yu.A. Vasyanovich, А. R. Tukhbatulin · Mine Surveying and Subsurface Use (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS