Coexistence of Accrual Accounting and Commitment‐Cash Budgeting: Evidence from European Union Agencies

ABSTRACT Many entities in the public sector reporting accounting information on an accrual basis continue to prepare budgets on a commitment‐cash basis. In this article, we analyze the effects of this coexistence in European Union agencies by empirically testing four propositions put forward in the existing literature. Our study examined the impact of various factors on the variance between economic and budgetary results in EU agencies’ financial reporting. While previous research suggested a decreasing correlation between accrual and budgetary results over time, we find no clear trend. Our study confirmed that as accrual accounting experience increases, conceptual differences between accrual and budgetary results become more pronounced. However, our study does not support the idea that reconciliation between accrual and budgetary results becomes more difficult with increased experience. Additionally, we find no evidence that the coexistence of accrual and cash‐based systems hinders the implementation of the new accrual system, as the EU agencies received unqualified audit opinions on the reliability of their accounts right from the start. We conclude that differences in institutional conditions and pressures between Italian municipalities and European institutions led to the differences in the findings of this study and existing literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Accountability and Management
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70006
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coexistence of Accrual Accounting and Commitment‐Cash Budgeting: Evidence from European Union Agencies

F.D.J. van Schaik
Financial Accountability and Management
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Coexistence of Accrual Accounting and Commitment‐Cash Budgeting: Evidence from European Union Agencies

F.D.J. van Schaik
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many entities in the public sector reporting accounting information on an accrual basis continue to prepare budgets on a commitment‐cash basis. In this article, we analyze the effects of this coexistence in European Union agencies by empirically testing four propositions put forward in the existing literature. Our study examined the impact of various factors on the variance between economic and budgetary results in EU agencies’ financial reporting. While previous research suggested a decreasing correlation between accrual and budgetary results over time, we find no clear trend. Our study confirmed that as accrual accounting experience increases, conceptual differences between accrual and budgetary results become more pronounced. However, our study does not support the idea that reconciliation between accrual and budgetary results becomes more difficult with increased experience. Additionally, we find no evidence that the coexistence of accrual and cash‐based systems hinders the implementation of the new accrual system, as the EU agencies received unqualified audit opinions on the reliability of their accounts right from the start. We conclude that differences in institutional conditions and pressures between Italian municipalities and European institutions led to the differences in the findings of this study and existing literature.

Financial Accountability and ManagementVol. 42(1)
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.