Understanding Explainability in Recommender Systems-User Insights and Perspectives

This paper presents our preliminary findings from a systematic literature review on explainability in recommender systems from a user-centered perspective. Despite extensive literature on explainability in Artificial Intelligence (XAI), this study focuses specifically on how explain ability in recommender systems affects user trust, taking into account insights drawn from design and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). To this end, we extracted 387 journal and conference papers from ACM, IEEE, Taylor and Francis, Science Direct, and Springer. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 relevant articles published between 2018 and 2024 were selected for this analysis. According to the results, users value justifications for recommendations to better understand why certain products or services are suggested. Moreover, scrutability is crucial for enabling users to provide feedback when recommendations do not align with their preferences. Explanations should be informative and easily understandable to enhance transparency and decision-making efficiency. The final component of fostering user trust, satisfaction, and transparency is to provide adaptive explanations, allowing users to control the level of detail based on their mental models and personal characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ethics65148.2025.11098238
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Explainability in Recommender Systems-User Insights and Perspectives

Faisal Kalota, Abtin Karimi Malek Abadi, Atefeh Jamil Pour
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Understanding Explainability in Recommender Systems-User Insights and Perspectives

Faisal Kalota, Abtin Karimi Malek Abadi, Atefeh Jamil Pour
article en

Abstract

This paper presents our preliminary findings from a systematic literature review on explainability in recommender systems from a user-centered perspective. Despite extensive literature on explainability in Artificial Intelligence (XAI), this study focuses specifically on how explain ability in recommender systems affects user trust, taking into account insights drawn from design and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). To this end, we extracted 387 journal and conference papers from ACM, IEEE, Taylor and Francis, Science Direct, and Springer. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 relevant articles published between 2018 and 2024 were selected for this analysis. According to the results, users value justifications for recommendations to better understand why certain products or services are suggested. Moreover, scrutability is crucial for enabling users to provide feedback when recommendations do not align with their preferences. Explanations should be informative and easily understandable to enhance transparency and decision-making efficiency. The final component of fostering user trust, satisfaction, and transparency is to provide adaptive explanations, allowing users to control the level of detail based on their mental models and personal characteristics.

Ball State University (US)
Ball State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.