Methodological Reflections on Designing Surveys to Explore Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of AI Ethics Education

Despite the rapid expansion of AI ethics education interventions across various institutions, there is a notable absence of empirical research systematically mapping or comparing these interventions. Furthermore, the extent and mechanisms of their effectiveness or ineffectiveness remain largely unexplored. To address these gaps, we aim to design and conduct the first-of-its-kind national survey on the state of AI ethics education. This survey will examine how faculty and administrators across the spectrum of American colleges and universities approach AI ethics education. This paper presents our reflections on the methodology behind designing two surveys intended to explore faculty and administrator perceptions of AI ethics education. It also briefly introduces the structures of the two surveys. We hope the findings from this paper will be of particular interest to scholars and educators focused on evaluating institutional-level ethics education in technology and engineering disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ethics65148.2025.11098311
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Reflections on Designing Surveys to Explore Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of AI Ethics Education

G. Logan Miller, Caitlyn Geraci, Deborah S. Mower, Kylee Shiekh et al.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Methodological Reflections on Designing Surveys to Explore Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of AI Ethics Education

G. Logan Miller, Caitlyn Geraci, Deborah S. Mower, Kylee Shiekh, Qin Zhu
article en

Abstract

Despite the rapid expansion of AI ethics education interventions across various institutions, there is a notable absence of empirical research systematically mapping or comparing these interventions. Furthermore, the extent and mechanisms of their effectiveness or ineffectiveness remain largely unexplored. To address these gaps, we aim to design and conduct the first-of-its-kind national survey on the state of AI ethics education. This survey will examine how faculty and administrators across the spectrum of American colleges and universities approach AI ethics education. This paper presents our reflections on the methodology behind designing two surveys intended to explore faculty and administrator perceptions of AI ethics education. It also briefly introduces the structures of the two surveys. We hope the findings from this paper will be of particular interest to scholars and educators focused on evaluating institutional-level ethics education in technology and engineering disciplines.

University of Mississippi (US), Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB), Virginia Tech (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methodological Reflections on Designing Surveys to Explore Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of AI Ethics Education — G. Logan Miller, Caitlyn Geraci, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS