Liquids and Microbial Electrolysis Cells for Boosted CO<sub>2</sub> Methanogenesis: Role of Interfacial Electron Transfer

This study explores the improvement of CO2 methanogenesis using microbial electrolysis systems (MESS) and ionic liquids (ILs). The microbial community adapted to CO2 methanogenesis showed performance enhancement over time, achieving 0.46 mmol/cycle of specific methane production in the combined MESS and IL system, while it was around 0.28 mmol/cycle for MES only. Under non-electrified conditions, methane production was quite lower (0.1 mmol/cycle). The highest CO2 conversion efficiency was achieved in the MESS/IL (M-I-E) group, followed by microbiology (M), MESS/IL (M-I), and MESS(M-E). ILs enhanced the electrochemical activity of MESS, resulting in a higher current to 0.61 ± 0.05 mA and a higher Coulombic efficiency to 68.8 ± 3%, compared to 0.45 ± 0.05 mA and 55.6 ± 2% for MESS alone. Further evidence for the improvements was shown by the reduced charge transfer resistance (2.37 ± 0.08 Ω) and enhanced biomass accumulation at the cathode. The microbial community analysis pointed out a significant shift in dominant species, including a significant increase in methanogens such as Methanobacterium sp. and Methanoculleus bourgensis. Metabolic responses showed upregulation of key genes involved in the transporters, Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, indicating that IL layers could provide channels directly or through outside cellular entities for electrons to efficiently shuttle for enhanced methanogenesis. These findings gain insights into the synergistic benefits of ILs and MESS in boosting CO2 methanogenesis and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Resource Management
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00136
Primary Topic
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liquids and Microbial Electrolysis Cells for Boosted CO2 Methanogenesis: Role of Interfacial Electron Transfer

Yilu Chen, S.H. Chen, Yang‐Chun Yong, Qingmei Wen et al.
1 links
ACS Sustainable Resource Management
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
article

Liquids and Microbial Electrolysis Cells for Boosted CO2 Methanogenesis: Role of Interfacial Electron Transfer

Yilu Chen, S.H. Chen, Yang‐Chun Yong, Qingmei Wen, Yongming Sun, Lei Zhang, Ying Guo, Tao Zheng, Yinge Bai
article en

Abstract

This study explores the improvement of CO2 methanogenesis using microbial electrolysis systems (MESS) and ionic liquids (ILs). The microbial community adapted to CO2 methanogenesis showed performance enhancement over time, achieving 0.46 mmol/cycle of specific methane production in the combined MESS and IL system, while it was around 0.28 mmol/cycle for MES only. Under non-electrified conditions, methane production was quite lower (0.1 mmol/cycle). The highest CO2 conversion efficiency was achieved in the MESS/IL (M-I-E) group, followed by microbiology (M), MESS/IL (M-I), and MESS(M-E). ILs enhanced the electrochemical activity of MESS, resulting in a higher current to 0.61 ± 0.05 mA and a higher Coulombic efficiency to 68.8 ± 3%, compared to 0.45 ± 0.05 mA and 55.6 ± 2% for MESS alone. Further evidence for the improvements was shown by the reduced charge transfer resistance (2.37 ± 0.08 Ω) and enhanced biomass accumulation at the cathode. The microbial community analysis pointed out a significant shift in dominant species, including a significant increase in methanogens such as Methanobacterium sp. and Methanoculleus bourgensis. Metabolic responses showed upregulation of key genes involved in the transporters, Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, indicating that IL layers could provide channels directly or through outside cellular entities for electrons to efficiently shuttle for enhanced methanogenesis. These findings gain insights into the synergistic benefits of ILs and MESS in boosting CO2 methanogenesis and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms.

ACS Sustainable Resource ManagementVol. 2(8)
Jiangsu University (CN), University of Waterloo (CA), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), National Institute for Nanotechnology (CA), Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion (CN), Institute of Process Engineering (CN), Biotechnology Research Institute (CA), Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.