Parental Paradox: Ethical Considerations in Supporting Parents of Transgender Youth When Politics or Faith Create a Divide

The care for transgender and gender diverse youth (TGD) has become a politically divisive topic, and access to care is increasingly restricted. Between 2022 and 2025, a surge in anti-trans legislation has led to twenty-six states banning gender-affirming care for youth, while only sixteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted protective “shield” laws. In this polarized environment, pediatricians face increasing ethical and clinical challenges, particularly when parents who oppose gender-affirming care present to the clinical setting. This paper offers a framework for navigating these situations through the lenses of care ethics and narrative ethics, emphasizing relational engagement over binary decision-making. This approach allows clinicians to support both the patient’s identity and the parent-child relationship. Clinicians should also recognize their moral obligations in a climate where legal constraints may inhibit care. As access becomes more limited, pediatricians must advocate for compassionate, evidence-based care while also supporting parents who may be struggling with grief, shame, or guilt. By honoring the narratives of both TGD youth and their families and by respecting the complex interplay in the relationship between parents/caregivers and teens, clinicians can facilitate ethically sound, affirming care that serves to minimize harms to the teen—even amid potential legal, political, and relational conflicts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Ethics
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63292/eble2208
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental Paradox: Ethical Considerations in Supporting Parents of Transgender Youth When Politics or Faith Create a Divide

Catherine D. Shubkin, Hannes Schroeder, Frances Lim-Liberty
1 citations
Journal of Pediatric Ethics
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

Parental Paradox: Ethical Considerations in Supporting Parents of Transgender Youth When Politics or Faith Create a Divide

Catherine D. Shubkin, Hannes Schroeder, Frances Lim-Liberty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The care for transgender and gender diverse youth (TGD) has become a politically divisive topic, and access to care is increasingly restricted. Between 2022 and 2025, a surge in anti-trans legislation has led to twenty-six states banning gender-affirming care for youth, while only sixteen states and the District of Columbia have enacted protective “shield” laws. In this polarized environment, pediatricians face increasing ethical and clinical challenges, particularly when parents who oppose gender-affirming care present to the clinical setting. This paper offers a framework for navigating these situations through the lenses of care ethics and narrative ethics, emphasizing relational engagement over binary decision-making. This approach allows clinicians to support both the patient’s identity and the parent-child relationship. Clinicians should also recognize their moral obligations in a climate where legal constraints may inhibit care. As access becomes more limited, pediatricians must advocate for compassionate, evidence-based care while also supporting parents who may be struggling with grief, shame, or guilt. By honoring the narratives of both TGD youth and their families and by respecting the complex interplay in the relationship between parents/caregivers and teens, clinicians can facilitate ethically sound, affirming care that serves to minimize harms to the teen—even amid potential legal, political, and relational conflicts.

Journal of Pediatric EthicsVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parental Paradox: Ethical Considerations in Supporting Parents of Transgender Youth When Politics or Faith Create a Divide — Catherine D. Shubkin, Hannes Schroeder, et al. · Journal of Pediatric Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS