Derivation and sensitivity analysis of a novel one-dimensional model of coronary blood flow accounting for vessel taper and boundary slip

Computational models of coronary flow allow quantification of virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) and absolute flow, reducing the need for invasive testing in supporting a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. One-dimensional (1-D) models of coronary flow are an emerging tool, which provide rapid assessment of coronary physiology. However, they currently do not fully account for side branch flow, the importance of which for clinically indeterminate cases is disputed. In the current study, we derive a novel 1-D model of coronary flow from the Navier-Stokes equations, which accounts for vessel taper, convective acceleration, and boundary slip. Using 15 idealized coronary arterial anatomies derived from patient data, we compared vFFR results from our model with those from a preexisting 1-D model of coronary flow. The techniques showed strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.99, <i>P</i> [Formula: see text]) with close agreement. Through a novel output-constrained global sensitivity analysis (GSA), we demonstrated that anatomical parameters, particularly the magnitude of simulated side branches, significantly influence vFFR in the diagnostic gray zone (0.75-0.85) and absolute coronary flow regardless of stenosis severity. This challenges the commonly accepted dominance of stenosis parameters. We present a more mathematically and anatomically consistent 1-D system for modeling coronary flow, which demonstrated modest differences with established models. GSA highlighted the influence of the flow diameter (Murray) scaling exponent in all cases when computing flow and in intermediate epicardial stenoses when quantifying vFFR. This work highlights the importance of accurately quantifying side branch flow when computing virtual coronary physiology.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> A new 1-D model for blood flow is derived accounting for vessel taper, side branch flow, and boundary slip. This model is applied to a novel output-constrained GSA, highlighting the influence of anatomical and flow input parameters within clinically relevant regions of virtual fractional flow reserve. Notably, we reveal the significant influence of the flow diameter scaling exponent in the virtual fractional flow reserve gray zone (0.75-0.85) compared with the conventionally accepted stenosis severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00187.2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Derivation and sensitivity analysis of a novel one-dimensional model of coronary blood flow accounting for vessel taper and boundary slip

Krzysztof Czechowicz, Ian Halliday, Julian Gunn, Leif Rune Hellevik et al.
2 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
2.78
article

Derivation and sensitivity analysis of a novel one-dimensional model of coronary blood flow accounting for vessel taper and boundary slip

Krzysztof Czechowicz, Ian Halliday, Julian Gunn, Leif Rune Hellevik, Harry Saxton, Tom Newman, Rebecca Gosling, Andrew Narracott, Xu Xu, Paul Morris, Daniel James Taylor, D. Rodney Hose
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Computational models of coronary flow allow quantification of virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) and absolute flow, reducing the need for invasive testing in supporting a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. One-dimensional (1-D) models of coronary flow are an emerging tool, which provide rapid assessment of coronary physiology. However, they currently do not fully account for side branch flow, the importance of which for clinically indeterminate cases is disputed. In the current study, we derive a novel 1-D model of coronary flow from the Navier-Stokes equations, which accounts for vessel taper, convective acceleration, and boundary slip. Using 15 idealized coronary arterial anatomies derived from patient data, we compared vFFR results from our model with those from a preexisting 1-D model of coronary flow. The techniques showed strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.99, <i>P</i> [Formula: see text]) with close agreement. Through a novel output-constrained global sensitivity analysis (GSA), we demonstrated that anatomical parameters, particularly the magnitude of simulated side branches, significantly influence vFFR in the diagnostic gray zone (0.75-0.85) and absolute coronary flow regardless of stenosis severity. This challenges the commonly accepted dominance of stenosis parameters. We present a more mathematically and anatomically consistent 1-D system for modeling coronary flow, which demonstrated modest differences with established models. GSA highlighted the influence of the flow diameter (Murray) scaling exponent in all cases when computing flow and in intermediate epicardial stenoses when quantifying vFFR. This work highlights the importance of accurately quantifying side branch flow when computing virtual coronary physiology.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> A new 1-D model for blood flow is derived accounting for vessel taper, side branch flow, and boundary slip. This model is applied to a novel output-constrained GSA, highlighting the influence of anatomical and flow input parameters within clinically relevant regions of virtual fractional flow reserve. Notably, we reveal the significant influence of the flow diameter scaling exponent in the virtual fractional flow reserve gray zone (0.75-0.85) compared with the conventionally accepted stenosis severity.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 329(5)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Insigneo (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.