Cassandra’s tears: population lung cancer screening in Western Europe

There is currently a highly unusual disparity in international access to lung cancer screening. Typically, underserved people in nations with restricted resources experience lower access to medical care and poorer outcomes than those in more prosperous societies. Today, the converse is true in Western Europe, where public access to lung cancer screening is unavailable outside of a research study. A review of global lung cancer screening public policy shows that, while population screening is now widely practiced in Asia and the United States, only three nations in Central Europe today offer national lung cancer screening programs, i.e., Poland (2020), Croatia (2020) and Czechia (2022). In Western Europe, despite major public expenditure to complete multiple randomized control trials (which reported highly favorable results), there is still today no nation that offers full access to a national CT screening program for citizens at risk. Why have Western European public health officials been reluctant to act in a timely manner while their citizens suffer and die—unscreened—from lung cancer? This question has major medical, social, ethical and political implications. The pathway from initial concept through research, guideline development, public health policy and funding is highly complex and differs substantially in individual nations. Policy research to determine the reasons for protracted delay in the implementation of population CT lung cancer screening in Western Europe is urgently needed. Every day of future delay in implementation will inevitably result in more unnecessary suffering and preventable death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia oncology.
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadonco7809
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cassandra’s tears: population lung cancer screening in Western Europe

Frederic W. Grannis
Academia oncology.
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Cassandra’s tears: population lung cancer screening in Western Europe

Frederic W. Grannis
article en

Abstract

There is currently a highly unusual disparity in international access to lung cancer screening. Typically, underserved people in nations with restricted resources experience lower access to medical care and poorer outcomes than those in more prosperous societies. Today, the converse is true in Western Europe, where public access to lung cancer screening is unavailable outside of a research study. A review of global lung cancer screening public policy shows that, while population screening is now widely practiced in Asia and the United States, only three nations in Central Europe today offer national lung cancer screening programs, i.e., Poland (2020), Croatia (2020) and Czechia (2022). In Western Europe, despite major public expenditure to complete multiple randomized control trials (which reported highly favorable results), there is still today no nation that offers full access to a national CT screening program for citizens at risk. Why have Western European public health officials been reluctant to act in a timely manner while their citizens suffer and die—unscreened—from lung cancer? This question has major medical, social, ethical and political implications. The pathway from initial concept through research, guideline development, public health policy and funding is highly complex and differs substantially in individual nations. Policy research to determine the reasons for protracted delay in the implementation of population CT lung cancer screening in Western Europe is urgently needed. Every day of future delay in implementation will inevitably result in more unnecessary suffering and preventable death.

Academia oncology.Vol. 2(3)
City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.