TRANSFORMING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION WITH GENERATIVE AI: STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES AND IMPACTS

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly shifting the contours of university teaching, learning, and administration.To identify concrete pathways for responsible adoption, we conducted 12 in-depth interviews with lecturers, students, and senior administrators at three research-intensive Chinese universities.Reflexive thematic analysis uncovered six inter-locking themes: GenAI as a pedagogical co-designer that accelerates content creation; heightened student engagement through low-stakes, iterative exploration; assessment redesign as a more effective integrity strategy than detection-and-deterrence; persistent digital-equity gaps driven by hardware, bandwidth, and licensing costs; staff capacity as the critical bottleneck, with structured "prompt-engineering" micro-credentials proving particularly effective; and the need for agile, participatory governance to keep pace with fast-moving tools.Taken together, the findings show that GenAI's transformative promise materialises only when technological affordances are matched by inclusive infrastructure, professional learning, and transparent policy.We therefore propose a three-pillar framework for institutions: i) pedagogical co-design: embed GenAI in curricula via task redesign and reflective documentation of AI use; ii) equitable enablement: invest in campus-wide compute resources, subsidised licences, and student support to prevent new digital divides; and iii) agile governance: establish multi-stakeholder committees that iteratively refine ethical guidelines, data-privacy safeguards, and citation norms.This study extends socio-technical theories of educational technology by linking micro-level user practice to macro-level organisational policy, and offers actionable recommendations for policymakers, educators, and technologists to cultivate a future-ready, ethically grounded learning ecosystem.

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36315/2025v2end110
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TRANSFORMING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION WITH GENERATIVE AI: STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES AND IMPACTS

Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

TRANSFORMING UNIVERSITY EDUCATION WITH GENERATIVE AI: STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES AND IMPACTS

article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly shifting the contours of university teaching, learning, and administration.To identify concrete pathways for responsible adoption, we conducted 12 in-depth interviews with lecturers, students, and senior administrators at three research-intensive Chinese universities.Reflexive thematic analysis uncovered six inter-locking themes: GenAI as a pedagogical co-designer that accelerates content creation; heightened student engagement through low-stakes, iterative exploration; assessment redesign as a more effective integrity strategy than detection-and-deterrence; persistent digital-equity gaps driven by hardware, bandwidth, and licensing costs; staff capacity as the critical bottleneck, with structured "prompt-engineering" micro-credentials proving particularly effective; and the need for agile, participatory governance to keep pace with fast-moving tools.Taken together, the findings show that GenAI's transformative promise materialises only when technological affordances are matched by inclusive infrastructure, professional learning, and transparent policy.We therefore propose a three-pillar framework for institutions: i) pedagogical co-design: embed GenAI in curricula via task redesign and reflective documentation of AI use; ii) equitable enablement: invest in campus-wide compute resources, subsidised licences, and student support to prevent new digital divides; and iii) agile governance: establish multi-stakeholder committees that iteratively refine ethical guidelines, data-privacy safeguards, and citation norms.This study extends socio-technical theories of educational technology by linking micro-level user practice to macro-level organisational policy, and offers actionable recommendations for policymakers, educators, and technologists to cultivate a future-ready, ethically grounded learning ecosystem.

Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.