The proposal from Haifa that the global definition of social work ought to be ‘reconstructed’: A critical commentary

Abstract In October 2024, this journal published an article by Tarshish (2025) ‘revisiting’ the International Federation of Social Workers’ global definition of social work (GDSW). This critical commentary identifies substantial concerns with this contribution and aims to address some of its gaps and elisions. Having discussed methodological problems with the Tarshish article, the commentary explores its striking omission of the genocide occurring in Gaza and wider factors related to the evolution of apartheid in Israel. Whilst refraining from personally criticizing Tarshish, it is contended that their proposal to ‘reconstruct’ the GDSW needs to be comprehended within the more encompassing social totality shaping the profession in Israel. Dwelling on such realities, wholly omitted in the Tarshish article, illuminates the fact that Israel, as a designedly ethno-racial and expansionist state, is constituted in a way that runs entirely counter to the ethical values amplified by the IFSW definition of the profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf135
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The proposal from Haifa that the global definition of social work ought to be ‘reconstructed’: A critical commentary

Paul Michael Garrett
4 citations
The British Journal of Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
14.63
article

The proposal from Haifa that the global definition of social work ought to be ‘reconstructed’: A critical commentary

Paul Michael Garrett
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In October 2024, this journal published an article by Tarshish (2025) ‘revisiting’ the International Federation of Social Workers’ global definition of social work (GDSW). This critical commentary identifies substantial concerns with this contribution and aims to address some of its gaps and elisions. Having discussed methodological problems with the Tarshish article, the commentary explores its striking omission of the genocide occurring in Gaza and wider factors related to the evolution of apartheid in Israel. Whilst refraining from personally criticizing Tarshish, it is contended that their proposal to ‘reconstruct’ the GDSW needs to be comprehended within the more encompassing social totality shaping the profession in Israel. Dwelling on such realities, wholly omitted in the Tarshish article, illuminates the fact that Israel, as a designedly ethno-racial and expansionist state, is constituted in a way that runs entirely counter to the ethical values amplified by the IFSW definition of the profession.

The British Journal of Social WorkVol. 55(6)
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), COPE Galway (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Work Education and Practice
14.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The proposal from Haifa that the global definition of social work ought to be ‘reconstructed’: A critical commentary — Paul Michael Garrett · The British Journal of Social Work (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS