The sum is larger than its parts: The daily interplay of leader and colleague support in facilitating employee well-being through balanced needs satisfaction and positive affect

Previous research drawing on the Self-Determination Theory has demonstrated that the satisfaction of each basic psychological need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness exhibits unique positive effects on employee well-being independent of the satisfaction of the other needs (i.e., additive hypothesis). In comparison, more recent theorizing has suggested taking a more holistic view of needs satisfaction by proposing that the equal satisfaction of each need relative to the other needs contributes to wellbeing beyond the overall satisfaction of the three needs (i.e., balance hypothesis). The present study aims to expand our understanding of the balance hypothesis. We propose that leader and colleagues’ support jointly contribute to balanced needs satisfaction, which promotes positive affect that in turn enriches home-domain wellbeing (i.e., subjective vitality). We integrate Self-Determination Theory and the Work-Home Resources model to suggest that beyond the satisfaction of each independent need, balanced needs satisfaction serves as a mechanism linking workplace support to the transfer of volatile energetic resources (positive affect) across domains. A diary study across 10 workdays with N=85 employees offers support for our research model as we find that joint leader and colleague support are indirectly related to home-domain subjective vitality via the balanced satisfaction of the basic psychological needs and positive affect. Supplementary analysis using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) further corroborates the distinct contribution of balanced needs satisfaction to well-being. We subsequently discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings. • The balance hypothesis represents a unique SDT mechanism contributing to well-being. • Balanced needs satisfaction is a determinant of work-home enrichment processes. • Balanced needs satisfaction generates positive daily affective states. • Colleagues and leader's support jointly facilitate balanced needs satisfaction. • Latent profile analysis supports the validity of the balance hypothesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104166
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The sum is larger than its parts: The daily interplay of leader and colleague support in facilitating employee well-being through balanced needs satisfaction and positive affect

Nicholas Theodorakopoulos, Ioannis Kratsiotis, Wladislaw Rivkin, Charlotte Hohnemann
1 links
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

The sum is larger than its parts: The daily interplay of leader and colleague support in facilitating employee well-being through balanced needs satisfaction and positive affect

Nicholas Theodorakopoulos, Ioannis Kratsiotis, Wladislaw Rivkin, Charlotte Hohnemann
article en

Abstract

Previous research drawing on the Self-Determination Theory has demonstrated that the satisfaction of each basic psychological need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness exhibits unique positive effects on employee well-being independent of the satisfaction of the other needs (i.e., additive hypothesis). In comparison, more recent theorizing has suggested taking a more holistic view of needs satisfaction by proposing that the equal satisfaction of each need relative to the other needs contributes to wellbeing beyond the overall satisfaction of the three needs (i.e., balance hypothesis). The present study aims to expand our understanding of the balance hypothesis. We propose that leader and colleagues’ support jointly contribute to balanced needs satisfaction, which promotes positive affect that in turn enriches home-domain wellbeing (i.e., subjective vitality). We integrate Self-Determination Theory and the Work-Home Resources model to suggest that beyond the satisfaction of each independent need, balanced needs satisfaction serves as a mechanism linking workplace support to the transfer of volatile energetic resources (positive affect) across domains. A diary study across 10 workdays with N=85 employees offers support for our research model as we find that joint leader and colleague support are indirectly related to home-domain subjective vitality via the balanced satisfaction of the basic psychological needs and positive affect. Supplementary analysis using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) further corroborates the distinct contribution of balanced needs satisfaction to well-being. We subsequently discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings. • The balance hypothesis represents a unique SDT mechanism contributing to well-being. • Balanced needs satisfaction is a determinant of work-home enrichment processes. • Balanced needs satisfaction generates positive daily affective states. • Colleagues and leader's support jointly facilitate balanced needs satisfaction. • Latent profile analysis supports the validity of the balance hypothesis.

Journal of Vocational BehaviorVol. 162
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Wuppertal (DE), Trinity College (CA), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Neapolis University Pafos (CY)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.