Monitoring Universal Jurisdiction’s Rocky Road

ABSTRACT This article examines the first trial worldwide to address crimes committed in The Gambia during President Yahya Jammeh’s rule. The trial, which was held in Germany under the principle of universal jurisdiction, concluded with the conviction and life imprisonment of Bai L., inter alia, for crimes against humanity. The trial raises several critical questions: Which of the challenges that emerged during the proceedings are characteristic of universal jurisdiction trials? How did the Court address these issues? What does this trial reveal about Germany’s often praised pioneering role in prosecuting international crimes? And which broader reflections on the use (and misuse) of universal jurisdiction are called for? The article draws on the authors’ experience as part of a Trial Monitoring Project that accompanied and documented the entire trial. By integrating insights both from the trial itself and from its monitoring, the article broadens the scope of ongoing discussions concerning universal jurisdiction, offering an additional layer to the discourse in Germany and other jurisdictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring Universal Jurisdiction’s Rocky Road

Rodolfo González Espinosa, Inês Freixo, Susann Aboueldahab
1 citations
Journal of International Criminal Justice
International Law and Human Rights
8.52
article

Monitoring Universal Jurisdiction’s Rocky Road

Rodolfo González Espinosa, Inês Freixo, Susann Aboueldahab
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines the first trial worldwide to address crimes committed in The Gambia during President Yahya Jammeh’s rule. The trial, which was held in Germany under the principle of universal jurisdiction, concluded with the conviction and life imprisonment of Bai L., inter alia, for crimes against humanity. The trial raises several critical questions: Which of the challenges that emerged during the proceedings are characteristic of universal jurisdiction trials? How did the Court address these issues? What does this trial reveal about Germany’s often praised pioneering role in prosecuting international crimes? And which broader reflections on the use (and misuse) of universal jurisdiction are called for? The article draws on the authors’ experience as part of a Trial Monitoring Project that accompanied and documented the entire trial. By integrating insights both from the trial itself and from its monitoring, the article broadens the scope of ongoing discussions concerning universal jurisdiction, offering an additional layer to the discourse in Germany and other jurisdictions.

Journal of International Criminal JusticeVol. 23(2)
University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Law and Human Rights
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Monitoring Universal Jurisdiction’s Rocky Road — Rodolfo González Espinosa, Inês Freixo, et al. · Journal of International Criminal Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS