MOGU LI SE KORIŠĆENJEM ARGUMENTACIJE U NASTAVI UNAPREDITI OBRAZOVNI ISHODI UČENIKA? PREGLED LITERATURE

The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the use of argumentation in education in order to summarize and synthesize empirical findings that examine the assumption that argumentation is an effective mechanism for promoting important educational outcomes. We analyzed eight highly cited, peer-reviewed studies covering typical developmental school and college demographics. The research confirms that participation in argumentation is associated with desirable educational outcomes such as mastery of curriculum content, bigger gains in knowledge tests, compared to other teaching and learning methods, conceptual change and conceptual understanding of scientific concepts, and knowledge transfer to new domains. Additionally, it leads to longer reading time, increased motivation and engagement, and more positive attitudes toward learning the subject. Qualitative data show that more nuanced distinctions within argumentation itself (e.g., one-sided/dialectical, quarrelsome/deliberative) can be made. The findings suggest that argumentation yields the greatest academic gains when it focuses on examining different alternatives rather than advocating for only one and constructing one-sided arguments. Therefore, it is essential to teach students how to engage in sound argumentation carefully and systematically.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46793/arted25.075p
Primary Topic
Educational Challenges and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MOGU LI SE KORIŠĆENJEM ARGUMENTACIJE U NASTAVI UNAPREDITI OBRAZOVNI ISHODI UČENIKA? PREGLED LITERATURE

Ljiljana Plazinić
Educational Challenges and Innovations
article

MOGU LI SE KORIŠĆENJEM ARGUMENTACIJE U NASTAVI UNAPREDITI OBRAZOVNI ISHODI UČENIKA? PREGLED LITERATURE

Ljiljana Plazinić
article en

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the use of argumentation in education in order to summarize and synthesize empirical findings that examine the assumption that argumentation is an effective mechanism for promoting important educational outcomes. We analyzed eight highly cited, peer-reviewed studies covering typical developmental school and college demographics. The research confirms that participation in argumentation is associated with desirable educational outcomes such as mastery of curriculum content, bigger gains in knowledge tests, compared to other teaching and learning methods, conceptual change and conceptual understanding of scientific concepts, and knowledge transfer to new domains. Additionally, it leads to longer reading time, increased motivation and engagement, and more positive attitudes toward learning the subject. Qualitative data show that more nuanced distinctions within argumentation itself (e.g., one-sided/dialectical, quarrelsome/deliberative) can be made. The findings suggest that argumentation yields the greatest academic gains when it focuses on examining different alternatives rather than advocating for only one and constructing one-sided arguments. Therefore, it is essential to teach students how to engage in sound argumentation carefully and systematically.

Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Educational Challenges and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.