Beyond “Individual” or “Collective” Resistance: Assessment towards an Agenda for Future Research on Dissent

We argue that studies of resistance have suffered from a bifurcation of fields, whereby some focus on organized forms (social movements, civil society or revolutions), while others are concerned with individual types (everyday, local and dispersed) of resistance. This de facto academic division has unwittingly obscured the links, dynamics, hybridity and entanglements between different forms of resistance. In order to stimulate a more complex and nuanced understanding of resistance, we propose a new research agenda for transdisciplinary studies of resistance and present some connections between individual and more collective/organized forms of resistance that need to be systematically explored in future research. Overall, this article argues for the need to recognize both the variation in forms of resistance, and the (often hybrid) linkages between them. The recognition that individual acts of resistance are fundamentally entangled with collective or organized dissent is necessary for shifting our understanding of resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Resistance Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.175
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond “Individual” or “Collective” Resistance: Assessment towards an Agenda for Future Research on Dissent

Kristin Wiksell, Stellan Vinthagen, Mona Lilja
2 citations
Journal of Resistance Studies
Social Media and Politics
7.73
article

Beyond “Individual” or “Collective” Resistance: Assessment towards an Agenda for Future Research on Dissent

Kristin Wiksell, Stellan Vinthagen, Mona Lilja
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We argue that studies of resistance have suffered from a bifurcation of fields, whereby some focus on organized forms (social movements, civil society or revolutions), while others are concerned with individual types (everyday, local and dispersed) of resistance. This de facto academic division has unwittingly obscured the links, dynamics, hybridity and entanglements between different forms of resistance. In order to stimulate a more complex and nuanced understanding of resistance, we propose a new research agenda for transdisciplinary studies of resistance and present some connections between individual and more collective/organized forms of resistance that need to be systematically explored in future research. Overall, this article argues for the need to recognize both the variation in forms of resistance, and the (often hybrid) linkages between them. The recognition that individual acts of resistance are fundamentally entangled with collective or organized dissent is necessary for shifting our understanding of resistance.

Journal of Resistance StudiesVol. 8(2)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Media and Politics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond “Individual” or “Collective” Resistance: Assessment towards an Agenda for Future Research on Dissent — Kristin Wiksell, Stellan Vinthagen, et al. · Journal of Resistance Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS