Analyzing the Progress of Interoperability Frameworks in Enabling Seamless Data Exchange across Healthcare Systems in the US and Australia

Generally, the interoperable health information exchange is very paramount for clinicians to have access to the timely and relevant patient health records. However, the progress of interoperability frameworks has been left unanswered while there has been significant investment into these frameworks. Thus, this study seeks to compare the progress of interoperability frameworks in seamless data exchange across healthcare systems in the US and Australia. The study adopts the systematic review design, which involves the use of structured and scientific approach to the review of literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The study showed that the US, in comparison to Australia, has a fragmented healthcare system with varying levels of interoperability across states and institutions. While the interoperability system in Australia is centralized, it is still faced with some challenges. Some of these challenges include underutilization of existing resources due to administrative burdens and privacy laws. It was revealed that healthcare centres in the US rely on multiple proprietary systems as their interoperability frameworks. Meanwhile, interoperability in healthcare centers in Australia is often faced with the challenge of fragmentation as a result of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The study concludes that both countries – the US and Australia – are faced with significant interoperability challenges. While the US struggles with regulatory fragmentation, Australia contends with policy misalignment and vendor control. Thus, it is recommended that future frameworks should concentrate on regulatory consistency, national alignment, and leveraging emerging technologies like blockchain technology for enhanced healthcare data exchange. Keywords: Interoperability, data exchange, Australia, the United States, blockchain technology

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v13i07.03
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Progress of Interoperability Frameworks in Enabling Seamless Data Exchange across Healthcare Systems in the US and Australia

Qazeem Faniran
Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Analyzing the Progress of Interoperability Frameworks in Enabling Seamless Data Exchange across Healthcare Systems in the US and Australia

Qazeem Faniran
article en

Abstract

Generally, the interoperable health information exchange is very paramount for clinicians to have access to the timely and relevant patient health records. However, the progress of interoperability frameworks has been left unanswered while there has been significant investment into these frameworks. Thus, this study seeks to compare the progress of interoperability frameworks in seamless data exchange across healthcare systems in the US and Australia. The study adopts the systematic review design, which involves the use of structured and scientific approach to the review of literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The study showed that the US, in comparison to Australia, has a fragmented healthcare system with varying levels of interoperability across states and institutions. While the interoperability system in Australia is centralized, it is still faced with some challenges. Some of these challenges include underutilization of existing resources due to administrative burdens and privacy laws. It was revealed that healthcare centres in the US rely on multiple proprietary systems as their interoperability frameworks. Meanwhile, interoperability in healthcare centers in Australia is often faced with the challenge of fragmentation as a result of clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The study concludes that both countries – the US and Australia – are faced with significant interoperability challenges. While the US struggles with regulatory fragmentation, Australia contends with policy misalignment and vendor control. Thus, it is recommended that future frameworks should concentrate on regulatory consistency, national alignment, and leveraging emerging technologies like blockchain technology for enhanced healthcare data exchange. Keywords: Interoperability, data exchange, Australia, the United States, blockchain technology

Journal of Medical Science And clinical ResearchVol. 13(07)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.