Navigating the complexities: South Africa’s journey in collecting data for international reading literacy assessments

Data collection for international large-scale assessments, such as the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), is a multifaceted process that demands meticulous planning, coordination, and execution to ensure accuracy and comparability across participating countries. This paper explores South Africa’s endeavours in collecting PIRLS data over the last two cycles (2016 and 2021). South Africa has faced unique challenges and opportunities in its quest to provide reliable data on reading literacy among primary school students. The data collection involves a collaborative effort between national education departments, schools, and international coordinating bodies. Key steps include sampling, instrument translation and adaptation, field staff training, data collection, and quality assurance measures. Investigating South Africa’s PIRLS data collection efforts highlights significant advancements in administrative capacity, stakeholder engagement, and methodological rigour. However, it also reveals persistent issues such as resource constraints, infrastructural disparities, and the need for continuous professional development. This paper underscores the importance of sustained investment in educational research infrastructure and international collaboration to enhance the quality of data collection processes. Ultimately, South Africa’s experiences offer valuable insights for other nations striving to improve their participation in international assessments, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of global educational outcomes and driving evidence-based policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1629826
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the complexities: South Africa’s journey in collecting data for international reading literacy assessments

Karen Roux
1 citations
Frontiers in Education
Educational Assessment and Improvement
4.17
article

Navigating the complexities: South Africa’s journey in collecting data for international reading literacy assessments

Karen Roux
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Data collection for international large-scale assessments, such as the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), is a multifaceted process that demands meticulous planning, coordination, and execution to ensure accuracy and comparability across participating countries. This paper explores South Africa’s endeavours in collecting PIRLS data over the last two cycles (2016 and 2021). South Africa has faced unique challenges and opportunities in its quest to provide reliable data on reading literacy among primary school students. The data collection involves a collaborative effort between national education departments, schools, and international coordinating bodies. Key steps include sampling, instrument translation and adaptation, field staff training, data collection, and quality assurance measures. Investigating South Africa’s PIRLS data collection efforts highlights significant advancements in administrative capacity, stakeholder engagement, and methodological rigour. However, it also reveals persistent issues such as resource constraints, infrastructural disparities, and the need for continuous professional development. This paper underscores the importance of sustained investment in educational research infrastructure and international collaboration to enhance the quality of data collection processes. Ultimately, South Africa’s experiences offer valuable insights for other nations striving to improve their participation in international assessments, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of global educational outcomes and driving evidence-based policy decisions.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.