Evaluating net-zero targets<i>’</i> impact on corporate GHG emissions

Abstract This paper investigates the effects that science-based targets (SBTs) have on corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we assess whether companies that commit to a net zero goal show a decrease in GHG emissions compared to similar companies that declare such goals later. Our results provide limited evidence that organizations with SBT reduce emissions, particularly for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, as the findings lack strong statistical significance. We also examine whether the pace of emission reductions increases as companies approach their target year. Our results indicate that efforts to reduce emissions increase before the announcement, but may stabilize thereafter. These results highlight the challenges of accurately assessing the tangible impact of voluntary corporate commitments on climate goals and underscore the need for comprehensive and clear reporting to prevent misleading claims and promote confidence in climate finance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adeff8
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating net-zero targets’ impact on corporate GHG emissions

Gabriele Sampagnaro, Dario Salerno
2 links
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Evaluating net-zero targets’ impact on corporate GHG emissions

Gabriele Sampagnaro, Dario Salerno
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the effects that science-based targets (SBTs) have on corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Using a difference-in-differences methodology, we assess whether companies that commit to a net zero goal show a decrease in GHG emissions compared to similar companies that declare such goals later. Our results provide limited evidence that organizations with SBT reduce emissions, particularly for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, as the findings lack strong statistical significance. We also examine whether the pace of emission reductions increases as companies approach their target year. Our results indicate that efforts to reduce emissions increase before the announcement, but may stabilize thereafter. These results highlight the challenges of accurately assessing the tangible impact of voluntary corporate commitments on climate goals and underscore the need for comprehensive and clear reporting to prevent misleading claims and promote confidence in climate finance.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(8)
Parthenope University of Naples (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.