The impact of using self-report versus objective measures of cardiometabolic conditions in epidemiologic research: a case study from India using data from the longitudinal aging study in India

Anti-conservative bias due to the use of self-reported measures of chronic cardiometabolic conditions in surveys conducted in low- and middle-income contexts may be common. Future studies may seek to quantify the magnitude of anticipated bias in existing data resources and use quantitative bias analysis to formally estimate the potential implications of misclassification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Epidemiology
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2024.1372972
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of using self-report versus objective measures of cardiometabolic conditions in epidemiologic research: a case study from India using data from the longitudinal aging study in India

T. V. Sekher, David E. Bloom, Jinkook Lee, Emma L. Nichols et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Epidemiology
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The impact of using self-report versus objective measures of cardiometabolic conditions in epidemiologic research: a case study from India using data from the longitudinal aging study in India

T. V. Sekher, David E. Bloom, Jinkook Lee, Emma L. Nichols, Peifeng Hu
article en

Abstract

Anti-conservative bias due to the use of self-reported measures of chronic cardiometabolic conditions in surveys conducted in low- and middle-income contexts may be common. Future studies may seek to quantify the magnitude of anticipated bias in existing data resources and use quantitative bias analysis to formally estimate the potential implications of misclassification.

Frontiers in EpidemiologyVol. 4
University of Southern California (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), International Institute for Population Sciences (IN), Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.