Fatherhood in Context: Intergenerational, Psychological, and Relational Influences

The current study examined a process model for father involvement that incorporated important contextual factors that have salient influence on paternal engagement. The proposed process model also included developmental outcomes for children. Longitudinal data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study was used to examine an adapted version of Belsky’s (1984) process model for the determinants of parenting. Fathers’ past involvement with their own fathers was negatively related fathers’ depression when their children were born. Furthermore, when children were newborns, paternal depression was negatively related to fathers’ intimate relationship quality with birth mothers. The most robust relationships were the following: a positive relationship between fathers’ intimate relationship quality when their children were born and later father involvement when their children were 3 years old; and a positive relationship between fathers’ intimate relationship quality when their children were newborns and later intimate relationship quality when children were 3 years old. Lastly, father involvement, intimate relationship quality, and the interaction between father involvement and intimate relationship quality when children were 3 years old significantly predicted child outcomes (pro-social, internalizing, and externalizing behaviors) when children were 5 years old. Fathers’ ethnic background was a significant moderator for the hypothesized model. Overall, the current study provides substantive evidence for the cascade effects of fathers’ developmental experiences on their individual functioning, intimate relationships, father-child relationships, and children’s development.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33790/jmhsb1100196
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fatherhood in Context: Intergenerational, Psychological, and Relational Influences

Heather A. Jones, Margaret K. Keiley, Cassandra L. Bolar
1 citations
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
article

Fatherhood in Context: Intergenerational, Psychological, and Relational Influences

Heather A. Jones, Margaret K. Keiley, Cassandra L. Bolar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The current study examined a process model for father involvement that incorporated important contextual factors that have salient influence on paternal engagement. The proposed process model also included developmental outcomes for children. Longitudinal data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study was used to examine an adapted version of Belsky’s (1984) process model for the determinants of parenting. Fathers’ past involvement with their own fathers was negatively related fathers’ depression when their children were born. Furthermore, when children were newborns, paternal depression was negatively related to fathers’ intimate relationship quality with birth mothers. The most robust relationships were the following: a positive relationship between fathers’ intimate relationship quality when their children were born and later father involvement when their children were 3 years old; and a positive relationship between fathers’ intimate relationship quality when their children were newborns and later intimate relationship quality when children were 3 years old. Lastly, father involvement, intimate relationship quality, and the interaction between father involvement and intimate relationship quality when children were 3 years old significantly predicted child outcomes (pro-social, internalizing, and externalizing behaviors) when children were 5 years old. Fathers’ ethnic background was a significant moderator for the hypothesized model. Overall, the current study provides substantive evidence for the cascade effects of fathers’ developmental experiences on their individual functioning, intimate relationships, father-child relationships, and children’s development.

Vol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.