Analysis of production factors determining agricultural productivity in Cuispes

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of productive factors – Capital, Labour, Knowledge, Technology, Management, and Land – on agricultural productivity in the district of Cuispes. A sample of 50 producers was analysed using a quantitative approach and PLS-SEM models, and further assessed across four productive groups through R statistical software, using ordinary least squares (OLS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) models. The results indicate that land fertility plays a fundamental role in the production process. PLS analysis reveals that Management, Technology, and Knowledge exhibit moderate and low positive correlations of 0.680, 0.632, and 0.341, respectively, whereas Capital and Labour show negative correlations of 0.252 and 0.400 with productivity. Group B excels in Land, Capital, and Technology (AHP: 0.44), demonstrating significant productive potential. OLS results confirm that the combination of Technology and Land is critical to agricultural success. Group D performs well in Knowledge and Technology (AHP: 0.25), and OLS identifies it as the second most significant group in terms of Technology use. Groups A and C score lower (AHP: 0.10 and 0.25), with a negative impact according to OLS; these groups require improvements in production methods and management practices to become more competitive in the market. It is concluded that Group B is the most productive sector, followed by Group D, both representing the most profitable activities in the district. Certain production factors should therefore be developed further, and public or private institutions should strengthen agricultural productivity through targeted public policies

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Horizons
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor4.2025.98
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of production factors determining agricultural productivity in Cuispes

Alex Javier Sánchez Pantaleón, Manuel Antonio Morante Dávila, Oscar Chávez Espinoza, Maritza Revilla Bueloth et al.
Scientific Horizons
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Analysis of production factors determining agricultural productivity in Cuispes

Alex Javier Sánchez Pantaleón, Manuel Antonio Morante Dávila, Oscar Chávez Espinoza, Maritza Revilla Bueloth, Irma Dolores Montenegro Rios
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of productive factors – Capital, Labour, Knowledge, Technology, Management, and Land – on agricultural productivity in the district of Cuispes. A sample of 50 producers was analysed using a quantitative approach and PLS-SEM models, and further assessed across four productive groups through R statistical software, using ordinary least squares (OLS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) models. The results indicate that land fertility plays a fundamental role in the production process. PLS analysis reveals that Management, Technology, and Knowledge exhibit moderate and low positive correlations of 0.680, 0.632, and 0.341, respectively, whereas Capital and Labour show negative correlations of 0.252 and 0.400 with productivity. Group B excels in Land, Capital, and Technology (AHP: 0.44), demonstrating significant productive potential. OLS results confirm that the combination of Technology and Land is critical to agricultural success. Group D performs well in Knowledge and Technology (AHP: 0.25), and OLS identifies it as the second most significant group in terms of Technology use. Groups A and C score lower (AHP: 0.10 and 0.25), with a negative impact according to OLS; these groups require improvements in production methods and management practices to become more competitive in the market. It is concluded that Group B is the most productive sector, followed by Group D, both representing the most profitable activities in the district. Certain production factors should therefore be developed further, and public or private institutions should strengthen agricultural productivity through targeted public policies

Scientific Horizons
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.