Government Interventions in Constitutional Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada

Abstract Governments are the most frequent interveners at the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC). However, we know little about government interventions, with the last substantive study only providing coverage of Charter cases up to 2007. To update this body of research, we provide an analysis of government interventions across all constitutional cases decided by the SCC between 2013 and 2023. Building upon earlier work by Hennigar (2010) and Radmilovic (2013), our study shows that despite changes to the intervener landscape in the past decade, governments continue to primarily intervene defensively in Charter cases. Importantly, however, our findings reveal complexity in how governments intervene across various constitutional cases, with distinct intervening behaviour in division of power disputes and reference cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423925100450
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government Interventions in Constitutional Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada

Danielle McNabb, Brendan Dell
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Government Interventions in Constitutional Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada

Danielle McNabb, Brendan Dell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Governments are the most frequent interveners at the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC). However, we know little about government interventions, with the last substantive study only providing coverage of Charter cases up to 2007. To update this body of research, we provide an analysis of government interventions across all constitutional cases decided by the SCC between 2013 and 2023. Building upon earlier work by Hennigar (2010) and Radmilovic (2013), our study shows that despite changes to the intervener landscape in the past decade, governments continue to primarily intervene defensively in Charter cases. Importantly, however, our findings reveal complexity in how governments intervene across various constitutional cases, with distinct intervening behaviour in division of power disputes and reference cases.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 58(4)
Brock University (CA), Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.