Identifying Controlling Behaviors in Police Reports for Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Risk Assessment

Abstract Purpose Practitioners and policy makers increasingly recognize controlling behaviors as forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) and potential indicators of risk of further harm. Accordingly, several countries have criminalized coercive control—the systematic use of controlling behaviors over time—in legislation and included controlling behaviors in risk assessment instruments for IPV. However, both intervening to prevent coercive control and using evidence of controlling behaviors to inform risk judgements depend on the identification of coercive control, particularly by frontline police officers. Method We examined 1,158 New Zealand Police reports for IPV episodes to (a) identify whether officers recorded evidence of controlling behaviors, and (b) determine if those controlling behaviors improved predictions of IPV recurrence and physical recurrence within 24 weeks, over and above New Zealand Police’s existing static risk assessment instrument. Results We identified at least one form of controlling behavior in almost half of reports—with the most common forms including isolating control (25.4%) and threatening control (18.7%)—and all controlling behaviors were recorded at similar rates for aggressors who were men ( n = 948) versus women ( n = 210). Including controlling behaviors (specifically, economic control) led to small improvements in the prediction of recurrence overall, and for men and women aggressors. For men, adding controlling behaviors did not improve prediction of physical recurrence; whereas no models predicted physical recurrence for women. Conclusions Our findings provide a small degree of support for including controlling behaviors—particularly economic control—in IPV risk assessment instruments for estimating risk of ongoing harm, but not its form. There is a need for further examination of how controlling behaviors manifest in different forms of family and intimate relationships, including where women are aggressors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-00946-6
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Controlling Behaviors in Police Reports for Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Risk Assessment

Apriel D. Jolliffe Simpson, Devon L. L. Polaschek, Samantha S. Taaka
Journal of Family Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Identifying Controlling Behaviors in Police Reports for Intimate Partner Violence: Implications for Risk Assessment

Apriel D. Jolliffe Simpson, Devon L. L. Polaschek, Samantha S. Taaka
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Practitioners and policy makers increasingly recognize controlling behaviors as forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) and potential indicators of risk of further harm. Accordingly, several countries have criminalized coercive control—the systematic use of controlling behaviors over time—in legislation and included controlling behaviors in risk assessment instruments for IPV. However, both intervening to prevent coercive control and using evidence of controlling behaviors to inform risk judgements depend on the identification of coercive control, particularly by frontline police officers. Method We examined 1,158 New Zealand Police reports for IPV episodes to (a) identify whether officers recorded evidence of controlling behaviors, and (b) determine if those controlling behaviors improved predictions of IPV recurrence and physical recurrence within 24 weeks, over and above New Zealand Police’s existing static risk assessment instrument. Results We identified at least one form of controlling behavior in almost half of reports—with the most common forms including isolating control (25.4%) and threatening control (18.7%)—and all controlling behaviors were recorded at similar rates for aggressors who were men ( n = 948) versus women ( n = 210). Including controlling behaviors (specifically, economic control) led to small improvements in the prediction of recurrence overall, and for men and women aggressors. For men, adding controlling behaviors did not improve prediction of physical recurrence; whereas no models predicted physical recurrence for women. Conclusions Our findings provide a small degree of support for including controlling behaviors—particularly economic control—in IPV risk assessment instruments for estimating risk of ongoing harm, but not its form. There is a need for further examination of how controlling behaviors manifest in different forms of family and intimate relationships, including where women are aggressors.

Journal of Family Violence
University of Waikato (NZ)
University of Waikato
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.