Parallel Disputes, Divergent Outcomes: The <scp>EU</scp>'s Automobile Trade Conflicts with Korea and China

Since the vulnerability of the EU's automobile industry, trade disputes have arisen between the EU and both Korea and China over automobile imports. Using the theory of “two‐level game” that emphasizes domestic politics as an analytical framework, this paper analyzes the game strategies and internal influences of the three parties in the two trade disputes between Korea and the EU, and between China and the EU. The study shows that the EU has adopted trade protection measures in both disputes for its industrial vulnerability, but the policy framework of the ROK‐EU FTA, the difference in the international situation, and China's role made the EU adopt different strategies for the two countries, and Trump's reelection also added new changes. At the last, the paper analyzed the reasons of the increasing of protectionism within the EU, and identifies three core considerations in the EU’s trade decision‐making. Additionally, the paper offers policy implications that emphasize the importance of FTAs, internal EU differences, and the need for diversified markets and industrial layout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Focus
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.70001
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parallel Disputes, Divergent Outcomes: The EU's Automobile Trade Conflicts with Korea and China

Bin Zheng, Jiyong Zheng, Wei Chen
Pacific Focus
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Parallel Disputes, Divergent Outcomes: The EU's Automobile Trade Conflicts with Korea and China

Bin Zheng, Jiyong Zheng, Wei Chen
article en

Abstract

Since the vulnerability of the EU's automobile industry, trade disputes have arisen between the EU and both Korea and China over automobile imports. Using the theory of “two‐level game” that emphasizes domestic politics as an analytical framework, this paper analyzes the game strategies and internal influences of the three parties in the two trade disputes between Korea and the EU, and between China and the EU. The study shows that the EU has adopted trade protection measures in both disputes for its industrial vulnerability, but the policy framework of the ROK‐EU FTA, the difference in the international situation, and China's role made the EU adopt different strategies for the two countries, and Trump's reelection also added new changes. At the last, the paper analyzed the reasons of the increasing of protectionism within the EU, and identifies three core considerations in the EU’s trade decision‐making. Additionally, the paper offers policy implications that emphasize the importance of FTAs, internal EU differences, and the need for diversified markets and industrial layout.

Pacific FocusVol. 40(2)
Tianjin Foreign Studies University (CN), Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parallel Disputes, Divergent Outcomes: The <scp>EU</scp>'s Automobile Trade Conflicts with Korea and China — Bin Zheng, Jiyong Zheng, et al. · Pacific Focus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS