Nationwide Screening for Arthropod, Fungal, and Bacterial Pests and Pathogens of Honey Bees: Utilizing Environmental DNA from Honey Samples in Australia

The European honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) significantly contributes to Australian agriculture, especially in honey production and the pollination of key crops. However, managed bee populations are declining due to pathogens, agrochemicals, poor forage, climate change, and habitat loss. Major threats include bacteria, fungi, mites, and pests. With the increasing demand for pollination and the movement of bee colonies, monitoring these threats is essential. It has been demonstrated that honey constitutes an easily accessible source of environmental DNA. Environmental DNA in honey comes from all organisms that either directly or indirectly aid in its production and those within the hive environments. In this study, we extracted eDNA from 135 honey samples and tested for the presence of DNA for seven key honey bee pathogens and pests-<i>Paenibacillus larvae</i>, <i>Melissococcus plutonius</i> (bacterial pathogens), <i>Nosema apis</i>, <i>Nosema ceranae</i> (microsporidian fungi), <i>Ascosphaera apis</i> (fungal pathogen), <i>Aethina tumida</i>, and <i>Galleria mellonella</i> (arthropod pests) by using end-point singleplex and multiplex PCR assays. <i>N. ceranae</i> emerged as the most prevalent pathogen, present in 57% of the samples. This was followed by the pests <i>A. tumida</i> (40%) and <i>G. mellonella</i> (37%), and the pathogens <i>P. larvae</i> (21%), <i>N. apis</i> (19%), and <i>M. plutonius</i> (18%). <i>A. apis</i> was detected in a smaller proportion of the samples, with a prevalence of 5%. Additionally, 19% of the samples tested negative for all pathogens and pests analysed. The data outlines essential information about the prevalence of significant arthropod, fungal, and bacterial pathogens and pests affecting honey bees in Australia, which is crucial for protecting the nation's beekeeping industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16080764
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationwide Screening for Arthropod, Fungal, and Bacterial Pests and Pathogens of Honey Bees: Utilizing Environmental DNA from Honey Samples in Australia

Travis Beddoe, Gemma Zerna, Gopika Bhasi
2 citations
Insects
Insect and Pesticide Research
3.34
article

Nationwide Screening for Arthropod, Fungal, and Bacterial Pests and Pathogens of Honey Bees: Utilizing Environmental DNA from Honey Samples in Australia

Travis Beddoe, Gemma Zerna, Gopika Bhasi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The European honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) significantly contributes to Australian agriculture, especially in honey production and the pollination of key crops. However, managed bee populations are declining due to pathogens, agrochemicals, poor forage, climate change, and habitat loss. Major threats include bacteria, fungi, mites, and pests. With the increasing demand for pollination and the movement of bee colonies, monitoring these threats is essential. It has been demonstrated that honey constitutes an easily accessible source of environmental DNA. Environmental DNA in honey comes from all organisms that either directly or indirectly aid in its production and those within the hive environments. In this study, we extracted eDNA from 135 honey samples and tested for the presence of DNA for seven key honey bee pathogens and pests-<i>Paenibacillus larvae</i>, <i>Melissococcus plutonius</i> (bacterial pathogens), <i>Nosema apis</i>, <i>Nosema ceranae</i> (microsporidian fungi), <i>Ascosphaera apis</i> (fungal pathogen), <i>Aethina tumida</i>, and <i>Galleria mellonella</i> (arthropod pests) by using end-point singleplex and multiplex PCR assays. <i>N. ceranae</i> emerged as the most prevalent pathogen, present in 57% of the samples. This was followed by the pests <i>A. tumida</i> (40%) and <i>G. mellonella</i> (37%), and the pathogens <i>P. larvae</i> (21%), <i>N. apis</i> (19%), and <i>M. plutonius</i> (18%). <i>A. apis</i> was detected in a smaller proportion of the samples, with a prevalence of 5%. Additionally, 19% of the samples tested negative for all pathogens and pests analysed. The data outlines essential information about the prevalence of significant arthropod, fungal, and bacterial pathogens and pests affecting honey bees in Australia, which is crucial for protecting the nation's beekeeping industry.

InsectsVol. 16(8)
La Trobe University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Insect and Pesticide Research
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nationwide Screening for Arthropod, Fungal, and Bacterial Pests and Pathogens of Honey Bees: Utilizing Environmental DNA from Honey Samples in Australia — Travis Beddoe, Gemma Zerna, et al. · Insects (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS