Assessment of a program for monitoring antimicrobial purchase and resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica on pig farms in the Midwestern United States from May 2020 through October 2023

Individual ages of pigs were a likely confounder and were not controlled for, as these data were not reliably collected. A greater frequency of monitoring, along with controlling for age, recent treatments, and disease events at the individual level, would improve farm-level insights from on-farm AMR monitoring. Currently, the interpretation of phenotypic AMR data for resistance monitoring in swine medicine is limited by the lack of established veterinary breakpoints for enteric organisms. The available NARMS breakpoints are designed for humans, can be used for public health monitoring, and are likely to be applicable primarily to gastrointestinal infections involving the same bacteria in farm animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1586008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of a program for monitoring antimicrobial purchase and resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica on pig farms in the Midwestern United States from May 2020 through October 2023

Noelle Noyes, Joel Nerem, Scott Dee, Laura Ruesch et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
0.50
article

Assessment of a program for monitoring antimicrobial purchase and resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica on pig farms in the Midwestern United States from May 2020 through October 2023

Noelle Noyes, Joel Nerem, Scott Dee, Laura Ruesch, H.M. Scott, Roy Edler, Taylor Spronk, Peter Ferm, Laura B. Goodman, Karyn Havas, Marta Braun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Individual ages of pigs were a likely confounder and were not controlled for, as these data were not reliably collected. A greater frequency of monitoring, along with controlling for age, recent treatments, and disease events at the individual level, would improve farm-level insights from on-farm AMR monitoring. Currently, the interpretation of phenotypic AMR data for resistance monitoring in swine medicine is limited by the lack of established veterinary breakpoints for enteric organisms. The available NARMS breakpoints are designed for humans, can be used for public health monitoring, and are likely to be applicable primarily to gastrointestinal infections involving the same bacteria in farm animals.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
University of Minnesota (US), South Dakota State University (US), Cornell University (US), Pipestone (United States) (US), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, South Dakota State University, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.