Quantifying the Bibliometric Impact of Published Research Associated with the IRIS Registry: A Comprehensive Analysis to Date

Purpose: To characterize trends in publications utilizing the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Intelligent Research In Sight (IRIS) Registry. Methods: Data was collected for the IRIS Registry publications as of December 2022 listed on the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s website. Type of literature, subspecialty topic, and specific disease/procedure of interest were categorized by two independent researchers and discordance was resolved by a third researcher. The main outcome measures were article year of publication, journal, type of literature, subspecialty topic, specific disease or procedure of interest, and source of funding. Results: A total of 54 articles were included. The rate of publication increased over time; in 2015 and 2016, only two IRIS Registry publications were recorded, whereas in 2021 and 2022, 36 publications were recorded. Ophthalmology published 43% of the articles; American Journal of Ophthalmology, 17%; and Ophthalmology Science, 7%. JAMA Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Retina, and Ophthalmology Glaucoma each published 6% of IRIS Registry articles. The most prevalent subspeciality topics were retina (35%), glaucoma (17%), and cataract (15%). Specific procedural treatments were the subject of 48% of the publications; disease epidemiology, of 17%; and specific medical treatments, of 13%. Most publications were original articles (82%). With regard to funding, 6% of publications reported funding solely from the IRIS grant, 41% obtained funding solely from other means, and 19% of publications obtained funding from a combination of the IRIS grant and other means. The most studied diseases among IRIS Registry publications were glaucoma (19%), age-related macular degeneration (9%), and cataract (7%). The two most studied treatments were anti–vascular endothelial growth factors (11%) and cataract surgery (11%). Conclusions: Since 2015, the IRIS Registry has proved an increasingly valuable font of data and support for original research in a range of subspecialties, leading to publication of insightful studies in prominent ophthalmology journals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62199/2475-4757.1285
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Bibliometric Impact of Published Research Associated with the IRIS Registry: A Comprehensive Analysis to Date

Hassaam S. Choudhry, Siddhant Kumarapuram, Mohammad H. Dastjerdi, Riya Patel
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Quantifying the Bibliometric Impact of Published Research Associated with the IRIS Registry: A Comprehensive Analysis to Date

Hassaam S. Choudhry, Siddhant Kumarapuram, Mohammad H. Dastjerdi, Riya Patel
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize trends in publications utilizing the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s Intelligent Research In Sight (IRIS) Registry. Methods: Data was collected for the IRIS Registry publications as of December 2022 listed on the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s website. Type of literature, subspecialty topic, and specific disease/procedure of interest were categorized by two independent researchers and discordance was resolved by a third researcher. The main outcome measures were article year of publication, journal, type of literature, subspecialty topic, specific disease or procedure of interest, and source of funding. Results: A total of 54 articles were included. The rate of publication increased over time; in 2015 and 2016, only two IRIS Registry publications were recorded, whereas in 2021 and 2022, 36 publications were recorded. Ophthalmology published 43% of the articles; American Journal of Ophthalmology, 17%; and Ophthalmology Science, 7%. JAMA Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Retina, and Ophthalmology Glaucoma each published 6% of IRIS Registry articles. The most prevalent subspeciality topics were retina (35%), glaucoma (17%), and cataract (15%). Specific procedural treatments were the subject of 48% of the publications; disease epidemiology, of 17%; and specific medical treatments, of 13%. Most publications were original articles (82%). With regard to funding, 6% of publications reported funding solely from the IRIS grant, 41% obtained funding solely from other means, and 19% of publications obtained funding from a combination of the IRIS grant and other means. The most studied diseases among IRIS Registry publications were glaucoma (19%), age-related macular degeneration (9%), and cataract (7%). The two most studied treatments were anti–vascular endothelial growth factors (11%) and cataract surgery (11%). Conclusions: Since 2015, the IRIS Registry has proved an increasingly valuable font of data and support for original research in a range of subspecialties, leading to publication of insightful studies in prominent ophthalmology journals.

Journal of Academic OphthalmologyVol. 17(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.