Responses to a nutritional supplement of lactating buffaloes exposed to hot weather conditions

Recent studies focus on animal welfare, heat stress (HS), climate change, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions from livestock. To mitigate HS effects and reduce CH4 emissions, various strategies exist. This study evaluated a commercial nutritional supplement in lactating dairy buffaloes during summer, assessing its impact on diet digestibility, milk production, and CH4 emissions. The supplement contained yeast, capsaicin, Yucca schidigera, garlic, and other compounds. Fifty-seven buffaloes were divided into three groups: control (C) with a basal diet, and two groups receiving 100 g (T1) or 200 g (T2) of the supplement. TMR, faeces, and milk samples were collected, CH4 emissions were measured using a laser gun-type detector, and animal behaviour was monitored via ear-tag sensors. Results indicate that 100 g/head/d of nutritional supplement improved milk yield (p < 0.01, MY = 8.51 L/head/d) and quality, especially the clotting parameter (p < 0.01, RCT = 19.02 min, a30 = 28.99 mm), diet digestibility (p < 0.01) for dry matter (69.12%), crude protein (67.23%), aNDF (62.39%), and starch (97.38%), and animal welfare compared with the control group (MY = 7.92 L/head/d, RCT = 20.01 min, a30 = 28.23 mm, and 60.47%, 57.80%, 50.87% and 96.31% for DM, CP, aNDF, and starch digestibility) and may help animals to counteract the deleterious effects of HS. Moreover, the nutritional supplement decreases (p < 0.05) CH4 emissions (376.28 and 404.68 g/head/d for T1 and C, respectively). Higher doses (i.e., 200 g/head/d) had significant deleterious effects such as worse digestibility, lower milk quality compared lower doses, and did not reduce CH4 as T1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2025.2534010
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses to a nutritional supplement of lactating buffaloes exposed to hot weather conditions

Roberto Steri, M. Iacurto, Loredana Basiricò, Francesca Petrocchi Jasinski et al.
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

Responses to a nutritional supplement of lactating buffaloes exposed to hot weather conditions

Roberto Steri, M. Iacurto, Loredana Basiricò, Francesca Petrocchi Jasinski, Chiara Evangelista, U. Bernabucci, David Meo Zilio
article en

Abstract

Recent studies focus on animal welfare, heat stress (HS), climate change, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions from livestock. To mitigate HS effects and reduce CH4 emissions, various strategies exist. This study evaluated a commercial nutritional supplement in lactating dairy buffaloes during summer, assessing its impact on diet digestibility, milk production, and CH4 emissions. The supplement contained yeast, capsaicin, Yucca schidigera, garlic, and other compounds. Fifty-seven buffaloes were divided into three groups: control (C) with a basal diet, and two groups receiving 100 g (T1) or 200 g (T2) of the supplement. TMR, faeces, and milk samples were collected, CH4 emissions were measured using a laser gun-type detector, and animal behaviour was monitored via ear-tag sensors. Results indicate that 100 g/head/d of nutritional supplement improved milk yield (p < 0.01, MY = 8.51 L/head/d) and quality, especially the clotting parameter (p < 0.01, RCT = 19.02 min, a30 = 28.99 mm), diet digestibility (p < 0.01) for dry matter (69.12%), crude protein (67.23%), aNDF (62.39%), and starch (97.38%), and animal welfare compared with the control group (MY = 7.92 L/head/d, RCT = 20.01 min, a30 = 28.23 mm, and 60.47%, 57.80%, 50.87% and 96.31% for DM, CP, aNDF, and starch digestibility) and may help animals to counteract the deleterious effects of HS. Moreover, the nutritional supplement decreases (p < 0.05) CH4 emissions (376.28 and 404.68 g/head/d for T1 and C, respectively). Higher doses (i.e., 200 g/head/d) had significant deleterious effects such as worse digestibility, lower milk quality compared lower doses, and did not reduce CH4 as T1.

Italian Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 24(1)
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), Centro di Ricerca per l’Orticoltura (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.