Investigation of change and stability in medical students’ ophthalmology specialty intention from matriculation to graduation: Gender and racial/ethnic differences

Purpose Using data from a national sample of graduating medical students, this study describes the patterns of change and stability in ophthalmology intentions relative to various other specialties and explains how those patterns vary by the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity. Method National survey data from MD-granting medical school graduates who matriculated between 2013-2014 and 2018-2019 and graduated by 2021-2022 were examined. The outcome consisted of four groups based on ophthalmology specialty intention at matriculation and graduation: non-ophthalmology, switched out, switched to, and reaffirmation. Percentages for “reaffirmation” and “switched to” were each compared to the median values for 13 major specialties (including ophthalmology). The outcome was examined by the intersection between gender (men vs. women) and race/ethnicity (White-alone, Asian-alone, underrepresented in medicine [URiM, including Black/African American, Hispanic, Alaska Native or American Indian, or Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander alone or in combination with any other race/ethnic group], and all other). Chi-square tests of independence and tests for the equality of proportions were employed. Results Of 59,908 respondents, 1,057 (1.8%) were ophthalmology-intending matriculants (OIMs), and 1,297 (2.2%) were ophthalmology-intending graduates (OIGs). The percentage of OIMs who reaffirmed their intention (33.7% [357/1,057]) was below (P < 0.05) that of the median specialty (37.3%). The percentage of OIGs who switched to ophthalmology at graduation (72.5% [940/1,297]) did not differ from that of the median specialty (72.0%). Among OIGs, URiM men (2.1% [83/4,018]), URiM women (1.3% [69/5,467]), and White women (1.2% [207/17,498]) were underrepresented relative to White men (2.7% [457/16,956]) (each, P < 0.05). Among OIMs, URiM women and White women each had lower percentages (1.4% [76/5,467] and 1.0% [180/17,498], respectively) relative to White men (1.9% [320/16,956]) (each, P < 0.05). URiM women and White women also had lower percentages (26.3% [20/76] and 30.0% [54/180], respectively) of OIMs reaffirming at graduation relative to White men [43.1%; 138/320]) (each, P < 0.05). Conclusion Findings provide further evidence that early recruitment and enrichment opportunities and ongoing retention are essential strategies for ensuring that the field is an attractive career option for a broadly diverse population of medical students. This study provides a template for investigating students’ career intentions during undergraduate medical education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62199/2475-4757.1002
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of change and stability in medical students’ ophthalmology specialty intention from matriculation to graduation: Gender and racial/ethnic differences

Douglas Grbic
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Medical Education and Admissions
article

Investigation of change and stability in medical students’ ophthalmology specialty intention from matriculation to graduation: Gender and racial/ethnic differences

Douglas Grbic
article en

Abstract

Purpose Using data from a national sample of graduating medical students, this study describes the patterns of change and stability in ophthalmology intentions relative to various other specialties and explains how those patterns vary by the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity. Method National survey data from MD-granting medical school graduates who matriculated between 2013-2014 and 2018-2019 and graduated by 2021-2022 were examined. The outcome consisted of four groups based on ophthalmology specialty intention at matriculation and graduation: non-ophthalmology, switched out, switched to, and reaffirmation. Percentages for “reaffirmation” and “switched to” were each compared to the median values for 13 major specialties (including ophthalmology). The outcome was examined by the intersection between gender (men vs. women) and race/ethnicity (White-alone, Asian-alone, underrepresented in medicine [URiM, including Black/African American, Hispanic, Alaska Native or American Indian, or Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander alone or in combination with any other race/ethnic group], and all other). Chi-square tests of independence and tests for the equality of proportions were employed. Results Of 59,908 respondents, 1,057 (1.8%) were ophthalmology-intending matriculants (OIMs), and 1,297 (2.2%) were ophthalmology-intending graduates (OIGs). The percentage of OIMs who reaffirmed their intention (33.7% [357/1,057]) was below (P < 0.05) that of the median specialty (37.3%). The percentage of OIGs who switched to ophthalmology at graduation (72.5% [940/1,297]) did not differ from that of the median specialty (72.0%). Among OIGs, URiM men (2.1% [83/4,018]), URiM women (1.3% [69/5,467]), and White women (1.2% [207/17,498]) were underrepresented relative to White men (2.7% [457/16,956]) (each, P < 0.05). Among OIMs, URiM women and White women each had lower percentages (1.4% [76/5,467] and 1.0% [180/17,498], respectively) relative to White men (1.9% [320/16,956]) (each, P < 0.05). URiM women and White women also had lower percentages (26.3% [20/76] and 30.0% [54/180], respectively) of OIMs reaffirming at graduation relative to White men [43.1%; 138/320]) (each, P < 0.05). Conclusion Findings provide further evidence that early recruitment and enrichment opportunities and ongoing retention are essential strategies for ensuring that the field is an attractive career option for a broadly diverse population of medical students. This study provides a template for investigating students’ career intentions during undergraduate medical education.

Journal of Academic OphthalmologyVol. 16(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Medical Education and Admissions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.