Generating More Ideas Makes Me Feel Better, Yet I Still Like My First Idea: Metacognitive Decisions when Generating and Selecting Ideas

Abstract In one experiment, we randomly assigned participants to either generate one or three ideas to open a new business. Participants were instructed that the ideas needed to be original and effective. Afterward, participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing metacognitive feelings, comparative evaluations of the idea generated, and some demographics. Participants in the one-idea condition generated more original ideas only when compared to the first idea generated by participants in the three-idea condition. When we made a comparison between the most original and effective idea generated in the three-idea condition, participants in the three-idea condition generated more original and effective ideas than participants in the one-idea condition. Participants in the three-idea condition were not aware that they had generated more original and effective ideas than what they thought by selecting their most creative idea. The serial order effect was supported for evaluations of originality. Conversely, the evaluations of effectiveness showed the opposite pattern. All results were interpreted in light of creative metacogniton.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Creativity Theories – Research – Applications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2025-0005
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating More Ideas Makes Me Feel Better, Yet I Still Like My First Idea: Metacognitive Decisions when Generating and Selecting Ideas

Rogelio Puente‐Díaz, Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo
Creativity Theories – Research – Applications
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Generating More Ideas Makes Me Feel Better, Yet I Still Like My First Idea: Metacognitive Decisions when Generating and Selecting Ideas

Rogelio Puente‐Díaz, Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo
article en

Abstract

Abstract In one experiment, we randomly assigned participants to either generate one or three ideas to open a new business. Participants were instructed that the ideas needed to be original and effective. Afterward, participants completed a battery of questionnaires assessing metacognitive feelings, comparative evaluations of the idea generated, and some demographics. Participants in the one-idea condition generated more original ideas only when compared to the first idea generated by participants in the three-idea condition. When we made a comparison between the most original and effective idea generated in the three-idea condition, participants in the three-idea condition generated more original and effective ideas than participants in the one-idea condition. Participants in the three-idea condition were not aware that they had generated more original and effective ideas than what they thought by selecting their most creative idea. The serial order effect was supported for evaluations of originality. Conversely, the evaluations of effectiveness showed the opposite pattern. All results were interpreted in light of creative metacogniton.

Creativity Theories – Research – ApplicationsVol. 12(1)
Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla (MX), Universidad Anáhuac México Sur (MX), Universidad Anáhuac (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.