Measuring gender diversity in public surveys: Implications for environmental values and sustainable choices in Europe

This study addresses the knowledge gap about gender, environmental values and sustainable choices due to current research in which (potentially) gender-diverse persons, if they are recognized at all, are dropped from the analysis of public surveys. Its novelty is that we cumulated the numbers of (potentially) gender-diverse persons in samples from general populations (Eurobarometer surveys) and focused the analysis on relationships between expanded gender options, ideological values, and political choices of environment and climate (henceforth green) issues over others. (Potentially) gender-diverse persons were primarily identified in countries where people trusted each other and in online over face-to-face interviews. In 13 high-trust countries ( N = 48,125), 131 participants self-identified as (potentially) gender diverse. In these countries, (potentially) gender-diverse persons showed different value preferences (favoring Human rights, Respect for the planet, Equality, and Solidarity) and more left-leaning political preferences than binary genders. Also, they scored higher on green issue salience; a stepwise multilevel regression analysis revealed that this difference decreased after inclusion of the values (Respect for the planet, Solidarity, Human rights) and left-right self-placement, controlling for individual- and country-level covariates. Whereas the binary genders exhibited—on average—small differences between women and men, the expanded gender options improved analytical outcomes, indicating that (potentially) gender-diverse persons may be more receptive to ideals of a just world and a healthy planet. Hence, recognizing and including gender-diverse persons in cross-national surveys not only enhances inclusivity but also yields distinct patterns in policy-relevant preferences—offering vital insights for research and policy-making in sustainability transitions. • Compares survey participants who are either or not (potentially) gender diverse. • In the context of countries with a high score on National level generalized trust. • Focuses on green issue salience, personal values and left-right self-placement. • The values include Respect for the planet, Human rights, and Solidarity. • Shows that (potentially) gender diverse persons may be more receptive to these values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108743
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring gender diversity in public surveys: Implications for environmental values and sustainable choices in Europe

H. Aiking, J. de Boer
3 citations
Ecological Economics
Environmental Education and Sustainability
7.27
article

Measuring gender diversity in public surveys: Implications for environmental values and sustainable choices in Europe

H. Aiking, J. de Boer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study addresses the knowledge gap about gender, environmental values and sustainable choices due to current research in which (potentially) gender-diverse persons, if they are recognized at all, are dropped from the analysis of public surveys. Its novelty is that we cumulated the numbers of (potentially) gender-diverse persons in samples from general populations (Eurobarometer surveys) and focused the analysis on relationships between expanded gender options, ideological values, and political choices of environment and climate (henceforth green) issues over others. (Potentially) gender-diverse persons were primarily identified in countries where people trusted each other and in online over face-to-face interviews. In 13 high-trust countries ( N = 48,125), 131 participants self-identified as (potentially) gender diverse. In these countries, (potentially) gender-diverse persons showed different value preferences (favoring Human rights, Respect for the planet, Equality, and Solidarity) and more left-leaning political preferences than binary genders. Also, they scored higher on green issue salience; a stepwise multilevel regression analysis revealed that this difference decreased after inclusion of the values (Respect for the planet, Solidarity, Human rights) and left-right self-placement, controlling for individual- and country-level covariates. Whereas the binary genders exhibited—on average—small differences between women and men, the expanded gender options improved analytical outcomes, indicating that (potentially) gender-diverse persons may be more receptive to ideals of a just world and a healthy planet. Hence, recognizing and including gender-diverse persons in cross-national surveys not only enhances inclusivity but also yields distinct patterns in policy-relevant preferences—offering vital insights for research and policy-making in sustainability transitions. • Compares survey participants who are either or not (potentially) gender diverse. • In the context of countries with a high score on National level generalized trust. • Focuses on green issue salience, personal values and left-right self-placement. • The values include Respect for the planet, Human rights, and Solidarity. • Shows that (potentially) gender diverse persons may be more receptive to these values.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 238
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.