Investigating the Factors Affecting the Applicability of Doctoral Dissertation Findings in the Field of Philosophy of Education in Educational Policy-Making

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the internal and external factors influencing the applicability of doctoral dissertations in the field of philosophy of education within the policy-making system of Iran's education sector. Methods and Materials: This study employed a qualitative-exploratory research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 policymakers from the Supreme Council of Education and members of the Curriculum and Educational Planning Commission, selected via purposive sampling based on theoretical saturation. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify categories and themes that reflect the conditions necessary for the practical use of doctoral dissertation findings in educational policy-making. Findings: The findings revealed that policymakers rarely use doctoral dissertations in philosophy of education as sources for policy-making due to both internal and external barriers. Internally, dissertations often lack strong methodologies, relevant problem selection, practical recommendations, and high-quality, applicable findings. Externally, the absence of structured collaboration between universities and policymakers, weak research culture, inadequate institutional mechanisms for dissemination, and insufficient information literacy among stakeholders hinder the utilization of research outputs. Among internal factors, the most influential were problem-based topic selection, practical findings, and precise problem definition. Among external factors, interaction between policymakers and researchers was identified as the most critical condition for enhancing applicability. Conclusion: To increase the impact of doctoral dissertations in philosophy of education on policy-making, there is a need for reforms at both academic and institutional levels. These include fostering stronger engagement between researchers and policymakers, improving methodological rigor, promoting applied and needs-based research, and establishing systemic frameworks for research dissemination and policy integration. Enhancing the research culture and institutional support will be essential to bridging the gap between academic inquiry and educational governance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijes.8.1.17
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Factors Affecting the Applicability of Doctoral Dissertation Findings in the Field of Philosophy of Education in Educational Policy-Making

Mahdi Mahmoudi, Mohamad Reza Sarmadi, Masoumeh Samadi, Havva Motamedi Barabadi
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Investigating the Factors Affecting the Applicability of Doctoral Dissertation Findings in the Field of Philosophy of Education in Educational Policy-Making

Mahdi Mahmoudi, Mohamad Reza Sarmadi, Masoumeh Samadi, Havva Motamedi Barabadi
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate the internal and external factors influencing the applicability of doctoral dissertations in the field of philosophy of education within the policy-making system of Iran's education sector. Methods and Materials: This study employed a qualitative-exploratory research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 policymakers from the Supreme Council of Education and members of the Curriculum and Educational Planning Commission, selected via purposive sampling based on theoretical saturation. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify categories and themes that reflect the conditions necessary for the practical use of doctoral dissertation findings in educational policy-making. Findings: The findings revealed that policymakers rarely use doctoral dissertations in philosophy of education as sources for policy-making due to both internal and external barriers. Internally, dissertations often lack strong methodologies, relevant problem selection, practical recommendations, and high-quality, applicable findings. Externally, the absence of structured collaboration between universities and policymakers, weak research culture, inadequate institutional mechanisms for dissemination, and insufficient information literacy among stakeholders hinder the utilization of research outputs. Among internal factors, the most influential were problem-based topic selection, practical findings, and precise problem definition. Among external factors, interaction between policymakers and researchers was identified as the most critical condition for enhancing applicability. Conclusion: To increase the impact of doctoral dissertations in philosophy of education on policy-making, there is a need for reforms at both academic and institutional levels. These include fostering stronger engagement between researchers and policymakers, improving methodological rigor, promoting applied and needs-based research, and establishing systemic frameworks for research dissemination and policy integration. Enhancing the research culture and institutional support will be essential to bridging the gap between academic inquiry and educational governance

Vol. 8(1)
Aerospace Research Institute (IR), Payame Noor University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.