How are we doing? Exploring service user satisfaction within a forensic community learning disability team

Purpose This service evaluation aimed to explore service user satisfaction regarding the care received from a Forensic Community Learning Disability team, in order to evaluate and improve service delivery. Design/methodology/approach A non-probability, purposive sampling method was adopted. All service users open to the team were invited to participate. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to explore service user satisfaction. Findings Thirty-nine individuals shared their experience of receiving input from the Forensic Community Team. Practical implications The importance of providing easy read information regarding the service and the support it provides was highlighted by the results, and contributed to the development of easy read leaflets. In addition, improvements to the Care Programme Approach process were identified and implemented, along with the need to review how and how often service user satisfaction is assessed. Originality/value There is a significant lack of research exploring the experiences of adults with a learning disability, particularly those who have offended and access forensic services. This evaluation provided an opportunity for adults with learning disabilities to influence service improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Practice
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-01-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How are we doing? Exploring service user satisfaction within a forensic community learning disability team

Malcolm H. Logan, Rebecca Coleman, Amy Jordan
1 links
Journal of Forensic Practice
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

How are we doing? Exploring service user satisfaction within a forensic community learning disability team

Malcolm H. Logan, Rebecca Coleman, Amy Jordan
article en

Abstract

Purpose This service evaluation aimed to explore service user satisfaction regarding the care received from a Forensic Community Learning Disability team, in order to evaluate and improve service delivery. Design/methodology/approach A non-probability, purposive sampling method was adopted. All service users open to the team were invited to participate. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to explore service user satisfaction. Findings Thirty-nine individuals shared their experience of receiving input from the Forensic Community Team. Practical implications The importance of providing easy read information regarding the service and the support it provides was highlighted by the results, and contributed to the development of easy read leaflets. In addition, improvements to the Care Programme Approach process were identified and implemented, along with the need to review how and how often service user satisfaction is assessed. Originality/value There is a significant lack of research exploring the experiences of adults with a learning disability, particularly those who have offended and access forensic services. This evaluation provided an opportunity for adults with learning disabilities to influence service improvement.

Journal of Forensic PracticeVol. 28(1)
Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Black Country Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How are we doing? Exploring service user satisfaction within a forensic community learning disability team — Malcolm H. Logan, Rebecca Coleman, et al. · Journal of Forensic Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS