De-Centering Whiteness in Theorizing Care: Culturally-Safe Care and Affective Technologies of Medical Racism

This paper examines the epistemic and ethical tensions that emerge in global movements to decolonize care, particularly through cultural safety and competency frameworks in healthcare. While these models aim to ensure dignified care for Black, Indigenous and racialized patients, they often remain limited by epistemic hierarchies rooted in whiteness. Drawing from feminist care ethics, and decolonial approaches to moral epistemology, I argue for an approach to comparative care that centers embodied presence, epistemic humility, and grounded relationality. Rather than treating difference in care as a static moral template, I propose a care-ethical notion of hearing difference, in caring, as a dynamic—shaped by situated ethical selves navigating intersecting and anti-colonial lineages of care. The paper critiques the tendency to abstract care into masterly knowledge and calls for a deeper commitment to ‘thinking-with’ others across difference. Ultimately, caring across divides demands we move beyond inclusion toward reciprocal, consent-based practices that honor the complex, evolving needs of those receiving care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21825/digest.95439
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-Centering Whiteness in Theorizing Care: Culturally-Safe Care and Affective Technologies of Medical Racism

Sarah Munawar
DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

De-Centering Whiteness in Theorizing Care: Culturally-Safe Care and Affective Technologies of Medical Racism

Sarah Munawar
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the epistemic and ethical tensions that emerge in global movements to decolonize care, particularly through cultural safety and competency frameworks in healthcare. While these models aim to ensure dignified care for Black, Indigenous and racialized patients, they often remain limited by epistemic hierarchies rooted in whiteness. Drawing from feminist care ethics, and decolonial approaches to moral epistemology, I argue for an approach to comparative care that centers embodied presence, epistemic humility, and grounded relationality. Rather than treating difference in care as a static moral template, I propose a care-ethical notion of hearing difference, in caring, as a dynamic—shaped by situated ethical selves navigating intersecting and anti-colonial lineages of care. The paper critiques the tendency to abstract care into masterly knowledge and calls for a deeper commitment to ‘thinking-with’ others across difference. Ultimately, caring across divides demands we move beyond inclusion toward reciprocal, consent-based practices that honor the complex, evolving needs of those receiving care.

DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender StudiesVol. 12(1)
Columbia College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De-Centering Whiteness in Theorizing Care: Culturally-Safe Care and Affective Technologies of Medical Racism — Sarah Munawar · DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS