Carbon dynamics after thinning in two boreal forest sites: Upland and drained peatland

Boreal forests act as crucial carbon storage, but their management can have important consequences for their carbon dynamics. Thinning of the stand alters carbon storage by removing trees, which affects the overall forest growth. Thinning stimulates growth of the remaining trees and affects soil processes in complex ways, while the overall impacts vary by forest type and site conditions. We applied biometric and soil CO 2 flux measurement data to study the changes in carbon storage across multiple forest components in both an upland and a drained peatland forest undergoing thinning operations. Following thinning, the carbon accumulation rate of the aboveground biomass components declined sharply due to the removal of trees but started recovering a year after the thinning, largely driven by forest floor vegetation. Belowground biomass components followed a similar trend. Carbon emissions increased post-thinning, mainly due to decomposition of harvest residues. The upland forest net ecosystem production (NEP) temporarily shifted to a net source of carbon (-43 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) but it recovered the following year to a net carbon sink (164 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹). The drained peatland forest NEP remained negative, with thinning further increasing the CO 2 emissions (-570 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) and leading to a slow recovery (-488 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) to pre-thinning levels. The tree carbon stocks in both forest type is projected to take over a decade to recover. The effects of thinning on forest carbon dynamics show short-term changes in the upland forest but more lasting consequences in the drained peatland forest due to slower tree growth and persistent emissions. • Post-thinning, the forest partly recovered, mainly driven by floor vegetation growth. • Thinning turned the upland forest a carbon source, but it quickly returned to a sink. • Peatland stayed a carbon source throughout; thinning increased the emissions further. • Both forest types show some recovery in carbon accumulation rates. • Tree carbon stocks may take years or decades to reach pre-thinning levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon dynamics after thinning in two boreal forest sites: Upland and drained peatland

Helena Rautakoski, Jaana Bäck, Anna Lintunen, Raisa Mäkipää et al.
1 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Carbon dynamics after thinning in two boreal forest sites: Upland and drained peatland

Helena Rautakoski, Jaana Bäck, Anna Lintunen, Raisa Mäkipää, Yann Salmon, Gonzalo de Quesada, Petri Salovaara, Annalea Lohila, Jussi Heinonsalo, Tuula Larmola, Markku Koskinen, Mikko Peltoniemi, Aleksi Lehtonen, Juho Aalto, Qian Li, Jie Xu, Vilma Anttila
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Boreal forests act as crucial carbon storage, but their management can have important consequences for their carbon dynamics. Thinning of the stand alters carbon storage by removing trees, which affects the overall forest growth. Thinning stimulates growth of the remaining trees and affects soil processes in complex ways, while the overall impacts vary by forest type and site conditions. We applied biometric and soil CO 2 flux measurement data to study the changes in carbon storage across multiple forest components in both an upland and a drained peatland forest undergoing thinning operations. Following thinning, the carbon accumulation rate of the aboveground biomass components declined sharply due to the removal of trees but started recovering a year after the thinning, largely driven by forest floor vegetation. Belowground biomass components followed a similar trend. Carbon emissions increased post-thinning, mainly due to decomposition of harvest residues. The upland forest net ecosystem production (NEP) temporarily shifted to a net source of carbon (-43 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) but it recovered the following year to a net carbon sink (164 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹). The drained peatland forest NEP remained negative, with thinning further increasing the CO 2 emissions (-570 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) and leading to a slow recovery (-488 g C m⁻² yr⁻¹) to pre-thinning levels. The tree carbon stocks in both forest type is projected to take over a decade to recover. The effects of thinning on forest carbon dynamics show short-term changes in the upland forest but more lasting consequences in the drained peatland forest due to slower tree growth and persistent emissions. • Post-thinning, the forest partly recovered, mainly driven by floor vegetation growth. • Thinning turned the upland forest a carbon source, but it quickly returned to a sink. • Peatland stayed a carbon source throughout; thinning increased the emissions further. • Both forest types show some recovery in carbon accumulation rates. • Tree carbon stocks may take years or decades to reach pre-thinning levels.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 595
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.