Four colours of carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems

<p>Terrestrial ecosystems are important carbon (C) sinks that absorb 31% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions. Understanding the formation mechanisms and enhancement strategies of terrestrial carbon sinks is necessary for assessing their magnitude, spatiotemporal dynamics, and potential. This knowledge is also the foundation for implementing effective management measures and technological approaches to enhance terrestrial carbon sinks, which is essential for achieving carbon neutrality and limiting global warming to less than 1.5°C. Here we propose that the terrestrial carbon sinks can be systematically conceptualized into four colours, specifically green carbon, black carbon, blue carbon, and white carbon. We elucidate the definition, current distribution, and approaches for enhancing carbon sinks of these four colours. Our results indicate that the current four-colour carbon sink globally is 4.4 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>. The global potential to enhance the four-colour carbon sinks is estimated to be 11.9 ± 2.2 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>. Using China as a case study, where its current four-colour carbon sink amounts to 0.74 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>, we also introduce the approaches to enhancing carbon sinks of these colours, along with their mitigation potential, costs, environmental risks, and social acceptance. Finally, we highlight priority research areas for future studies to advance the scientific and practical understanding of terrestrial carbon sinks.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Innovation Geoscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2025.100162
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four colours of carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems

Guirui Yu, Shuli Niu, Yunting Fang, Dabing Li et al.
2 citations
The Innovation Geoscience
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Four colours of carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems

Guirui Yu, Shuli Niu, Yunting Fang, Dabing Li, Jiaoyue Wang, Ronghua Kang, Chenxia Su, Chunwu Zhu, X. L. Lu, Zhi Quan, Pengpeng Duan, A. J. Wang, Yu Liang, Zhihua Liu, Feng Li, Jianguo Huang, Yugang Wang, Xiaoxi Wang, Deze Liu, Lian Song, Feifei Zhu, Guangxuan Han, Huoxing Zhu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<p>Terrestrial ecosystems are important carbon (C) sinks that absorb 31% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions. Understanding the formation mechanisms and enhancement strategies of terrestrial carbon sinks is necessary for assessing their magnitude, spatiotemporal dynamics, and potential. This knowledge is also the foundation for implementing effective management measures and technological approaches to enhance terrestrial carbon sinks, which is essential for achieving carbon neutrality and limiting global warming to less than 1.5°C. Here we propose that the terrestrial carbon sinks can be systematically conceptualized into four colours, specifically green carbon, black carbon, blue carbon, and white carbon. We elucidate the definition, current distribution, and approaches for enhancing carbon sinks of these four colours. Our results indicate that the current four-colour carbon sink globally is 4.4 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>. The global potential to enhance the four-colour carbon sinks is estimated to be 11.9 ± 2.2 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>. Using China as a case study, where its current four-colour carbon sink amounts to 0.74 Pg C yr<sup>-1</sup>, we also introduce the approaches to enhancing carbon sinks of these colours, along with their mitigation potential, costs, environmental risks, and social acceptance. Finally, we highlight priority research areas for future studies to advance the scientific and practical understanding of terrestrial carbon sinks.</p>

The Innovation GeoscienceVol. 3(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.