Optimizing One-Sample Tests for Proportions in Single- and Two-Stage Oncology Trials

This convolution-based approach offers a flexible and efficient alternative to traditional methods for early-phase oncology trial design. It addresses the conservativeness of existing designs and provides practical benefits in terms of resource use and study timelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152570
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing One-Sample Tests for Proportions in Single- and Two-Stage Oncology Trials

Alan D. Hutson
Cancers
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Optimizing One-Sample Tests for Proportions in Single- and Two-Stage Oncology Trials

Alan D. Hutson
article en

Abstract

This convolution-based approach offers a flexible and efficient alternative to traditional methods for early-phase oncology trial design. It addresses the conservativeness of existing designs and provides practical benefits in terms of resource use and study timelines.

CancersVol. 17(15)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing One-Sample Tests for Proportions in Single- and Two-Stage Oncology Trials — Alan D. Hutson · Cancers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS