Spontaneous Versus Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—A Scoping Review
This systematic review addresses current evidence concerning whether or not spontaneous ventilation with support or assistance is more advantageous for critically ill ventilator-dependent ARDS cases versus passive positive pressure ventilatory support. To distinguish and separate these 2 approaches in critical care treatment is challenging, and this review nicely presents the current state of evidence for this field, including knowledge gaps.
Authors
- Anders Perner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123)
- Kristin Hofsø (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5854-8461)
- Tayyba Naz Aslam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1376-1533)
- Jon Henrik Laake (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-5359)
- Morten Hylander Møller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6378-9673)
- Conni Skrubbeltrang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7478-8422)
- Thomas Klitgaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-1206)
- Bodil Steen Rasmussen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2190-145X)
Institutions
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO)
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (DK)
- Aalborg University (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Published
- 2025-08-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70096
- Primary Topic
- Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Helse Sør-Øst RHF