Bubble pinch‐off on biphilic and superhydrophobic surfaces

Abstract In this work, we experimentally measured the pinch‐off of a gas bubble on a biphilic surface, which consisted of an inner circular superhydrophobic region and an outer hydrophilic region. The superhydrophobic region had a radius of R SH varying from 2.8 to 19.0 mm, where the large R SH modeled an infinitely large superhydrophobic surface. We found that during the pinch‐off, the contact line had two different behaviors: for small R SH , the contact line was fixed at the boundary of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic regions, and the contact angle gradually increased; in contrast, for large R SH , the contact angle was fixed, and the contact line shrank toward the bubble center. Furthermore, we found that regardless of bubble size and contact line behavior, the minimum neck radius collapsed onto a single curve after proper normalizations and followed a power–law relation where the exponent was close to that for bubble pinch‐off from a nozzle. The local surface shapes near the neck were self‐similar. Our results suggest that the surface wettability has a negligible impact on the dynamics of pinch‐off, which is primarily driven by liquid inertia. Our findings improve the fundamental understanding of bubble pinch‐off on complex surfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Droplet
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dro2.70021
Primary Topic
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bubble pinch‐off on biphilic and superhydrophobic surfaces

I. Rodríguez, Hangjian Ling, Foram S. Fanasia, Paitynn Boutin
1 links
Droplet
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
article

Bubble pinch‐off on biphilic and superhydrophobic surfaces

I. Rodríguez, Hangjian Ling, Foram S. Fanasia, Paitynn Boutin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we experimentally measured the pinch‐off of a gas bubble on a biphilic surface, which consisted of an inner circular superhydrophobic region and an outer hydrophilic region. The superhydrophobic region had a radius of R SH varying from 2.8 to 19.0 mm, where the large R SH modeled an infinitely large superhydrophobic surface. We found that during the pinch‐off, the contact line had two different behaviors: for small R SH , the contact line was fixed at the boundary of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic regions, and the contact angle gradually increased; in contrast, for large R SH , the contact angle was fixed, and the contact line shrank toward the bubble center. Furthermore, we found that regardless of bubble size and contact line behavior, the minimum neck radius collapsed onto a single curve after proper normalizations and followed a power–law relation where the exponent was close to that for bubble pinch‐off from a nozzle. The local surface shapes near the neck were self‐similar. Our results suggest that the surface wettability has a negligible impact on the dynamics of pinch‐off, which is primarily driven by liquid inertia. Our findings improve the fundamental understanding of bubble pinch‐off on complex surfaces.

DropletVol. 4(4)
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bubble pinch‐off on biphilic and superhydrophobic surfaces — I. Rodríguez, Hangjian Ling, et al. · Droplet (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS