Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Innovative biomaterials are increasingly being investigated for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, the development of relevant preclinical models still need to be consiedered. This study aimed to propose a standardized and reproducible maxillary bone defect model in rats that could be relevant to evaluate new materials for GBR. Three defect sizes in rat maxillary of 2.8, 3.3, and 4.5 mm in diameter were compared. Bone formation was followed until 12 weeks post-surgery using longitudinal micro-computed tomography and histological analysis. The defect was subsequently filled by an osteoconductive bone substitute (GLYCOBONE), then covered either by a new natural polysaccharide membrane supplemented with hydroxyapatite, or by a commercial collagen membrane (BIO-GIDE). Results showed little spontaneous tissue regeneration for empty defects (bone volume fractions (BVF) below 40% after 12 weeks). The smallest size defect (2.8 mm) was the most reproducible and was thus selected for testing GBR membranes. Defects filled with GLYCOBONE and covered with membranes displayed for both materials accelerated and substantial bone regeneration (with BVF that reached 80% after 12 weeks). Histological sections showed immature bone formation for the empty defects, whereas the defects filled with the GBR membranes highlighted a lamellar structured bone. The polysaccharide membrane was as effective as the commercial collagen membrane to guide bone tissue regeneration. This study provides a step-by-step protocol of a new standardized rat maxillary bone defect model. In line with ethical and financial considerations, this rodent model should be considered as a preliminary level before performing larger animal experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1494352
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Laurent Bidault, Jean‐Christophe Fricain, Joëlle Amédée, Mathilde Fénelon et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
2.70
article

Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Laurent Bidault, Jean‐Christophe Fricain, Joëlle Amédée, Mathilde Fénelon, Naïma Ahmed Omar, Didier Letourneur, J.P. Roque, Céline Bergeaut
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Innovative biomaterials are increasingly being investigated for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, the development of relevant preclinical models still need to be consiedered. This study aimed to propose a standardized and reproducible maxillary bone defect model in rats that could be relevant to evaluate new materials for GBR. Three defect sizes in rat maxillary of 2.8, 3.3, and 4.5 mm in diameter were compared. Bone formation was followed until 12 weeks post-surgery using longitudinal micro-computed tomography and histological analysis. The defect was subsequently filled by an osteoconductive bone substitute (GLYCOBONE), then covered either by a new natural polysaccharide membrane supplemented with hydroxyapatite, or by a commercial collagen membrane (BIO-GIDE). Results showed little spontaneous tissue regeneration for empty defects (bone volume fractions (BVF) below 40% after 12 weeks). The smallest size defect (2.8 mm) was the most reproducible and was thus selected for testing GBR membranes. Defects filled with GLYCOBONE and covered with membranes displayed for both materials accelerated and substantial bone regeneration (with BVF that reached 80% after 12 weeks). Histological sections showed immature bone formation for the empty defects, whereas the defects filled with the GBR membranes highlighted a lamellar structured bone. The polysaccharide membrane was as effective as the commercial collagen membrane to guide bone tissue regeneration. This study provides a step-by-step protocol of a new standardized rat maxillary bone defect model. In line with ethical and financial considerations, this rodent model should be considered as a preliminary level before performing larger animal experiments.

Frontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologyVol. 13
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Délégation Paris 7 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Laboratoire de Recherche Vasculaire Translationnelle (FR)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.