Healing as Justice: Clinical Advocacy in Therapeutic Practice

This paper integrates insights from clinical narrative essays with frameworks from liberation medicine, critical medical anthropology, and restorative justice theory to propose a unified model of healing as justice. Drawing upon Paul Farmer's concept of accompaniment [1,2], Nancy Scheper-Hughes's embodied witnessing [3], and legal theories of dignity and repair [4], this study positions the physician as moral witness, narrative interpreter, and advocate for healing justice. Enhanced with insights from shame-based healing paradigms [5], Catholic social thought [6], ontological theories of suffering and healing [7], and anti-psychiatry critiques [8-10], this framework bridges personal therapeutic presence with structural analysis, offering a vision of medicine that recognizes the therapeutic encounter as a site where dignity is restored, suffering is witnessed, and justice is enacted through sacred attentiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & Reviews
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-944x.1420
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healing as Justice: Clinical Advocacy in Therapeutic Practice

Julian Ungar-Sargon
1 citations
Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & Reviews
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Healing as Justice: Clinical Advocacy in Therapeutic Practice

Julian Ungar-Sargon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper integrates insights from clinical narrative essays with frameworks from liberation medicine, critical medical anthropology, and restorative justice theory to propose a unified model of healing as justice. Drawing upon Paul Farmer's concept of accompaniment [1,2], Nancy Scheper-Hughes's embodied witnessing [3], and legal theories of dignity and repair [4], this study positions the physician as moral witness, narrative interpreter, and advocate for healing justice. Enhanced with insights from shame-based healing paradigms [5], Catholic social thought [6], ontological theories of suffering and healing [7], and anti-psychiatry critiques [8-10], this framework bridges personal therapeutic presence with structural analysis, offering a vision of medicine that recognizes the therapeutic encounter as a site where dignity is restored, suffering is witnessed, and justice is enacted through sacred attentiveness.

Journal of Medical - Clinical Research & ReviewsVol. 9(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.