Contemporary Outcomes and Predictors of Adverse Events After Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Report From an Aortic Center
Background: This study evaluates short‐term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) at a specialized aortic referral center. Methods: Between October 2019 and October 2022, 80 consecutive patients underwent surgery for ATAAD at Yale New Haven Hospital. The patients were categorized into three groups: Penn Class A ( n = 27) without malperfusion, Penn Class B ( n = 22) with localized malperfusion without circulatory shock, and Penn Class C ( n = 31) with generalized malperfusion and shock. Statistical analysis was performed to assess differences in perioperative descriptive variables, operative outcomes, and survival across Penn classification groups. Results: The mean age of patients was 65.2 ± 13.7 years, with 65% being male. Cerebral malperfusion was the predominant type ( p < 0.001). The most common surgical procedures performed were ascending and hemiarch aortic replacement with aortic valve/root repair. Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was more frequent in Penn Class B and Class C than in Penn Class A (50.0%, 41.9% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.02). Postoperative complications included pneumonia (23.8%), postoperative renal failure (48.8%), and unplanned reoperation (18.8%, mostly for bleeding). Postoperative strokes occurred in 10%, all but one with preoperative neurologic deficits; none in Penn Class A. Persistent neurologic deficits were more common in Penn Class C than Class B (19.4% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.049). Postoperative renal failure and dialysis were associated with both malperfusion groups. Penn Class C had higher postoperative pneumonia (38.7%, p = 0.04) and tracheostomy (35.5%, p = 0.003). Overall postoperative mortality was 10%, highest in Penn Class C (19.4%, p = 0.048). Three‐year postdischarge survival rates showed no significant differences between the groups (log‐rank, p = 0.57). Conclusion: Emergent surgical repair was linked to excellent survival (90%) and resolution of neurological deficit in 80% of patients. Circulatory shock showed the strongest association with operative mortality, followed by visceral malperfusion. No significant postdischarge survival differences were observed, though follow‐up was limited.
Authors
- Roland Assi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0863-9867)
- Alan Chou
- Abdulrahman Hassab (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0722-6007)
- Arnar Geirsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-9962)
- Prashanth Vallabhajosyula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1192-3367)
- James Antonios (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-2446)
- Matthew L. Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-2640)
Institutions
- UF Health Shands Hospital (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Yale University (US)
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Cardiac Surgery
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1155/jocs/6991973
- Primary Topic
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00