Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks

Large language models excel at problemsolving but often struggle with complex reasoning and factual accuracy.While chainof-thought and retrieval-augmented generation help break down problems and retrieve knowledge, they still falter on challenging tasks like competitive programming due to frequent reasoning errors and irrelevant retrieval.To address this, we introduce Critic-guided planning with Retrieval-augmentation, CR-Planner, a novel framework that leverages fine-tuned critic models to guide both reasoning and retrieval processes through planning.CR-Planner iteratively selects and executes sub-goals, guided by critic models.A sub-goal critic identifies promising sub-goals from reasoning, query generation, and retrieval, while an execution critic evaluates outputs of sub-goal executions.We employ Monte Carlo Tree Search to collect data for critic training, allowing systematic exploration of action sequences and effective navigation toward the final answer.We evaluate CR-Planner on challenging domain-knowledgeintensive and reasoning-heavy tasks, including competitive programming, theorem-driven math reasoning, and complex domain retrieval problems.It significantly outperforms baselines, demonstrating effectiveness in both reasoning and retrieval.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1244
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks

Shafiq Joty, Xingxuan Li, Fangkai Jiao, Lidong Bing et al.
1 citations
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
2.48
article

Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks

Shafiq Joty, Xingxuan Li, Fangkai Jiao, Lidong Bing, Weiwen Xu, Ruochen Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models excel at problemsolving but often struggle with complex reasoning and factual accuracy.While chainof-thought and retrieval-augmented generation help break down problems and retrieve knowledge, they still falter on challenging tasks like competitive programming due to frequent reasoning errors and irrelevant retrieval.To address this, we introduce Critic-guided planning with Retrieval-augmentation, CR-Planner, a novel framework that leverages fine-tuned critic models to guide both reasoning and retrieval processes through planning.CR-Planner iteratively selects and executes sub-goals, guided by critic models.A sub-goal critic identifies promising sub-goals from reasoning, query generation, and retrieval, while an execution critic evaluates outputs of sub-goal executions.We employ Monte Carlo Tree Search to collect data for critic training, allowing systematic exploration of action sequences and effective navigation toward the final answer.We evaluate CR-Planner on challenging domain-knowledgeintensive and reasoning-heavy tasks, including competitive programming, theorem-driven math reasoning, and complex domain retrieval problems.It significantly outperforms baselines, demonstrating effectiveness in both reasoning and retrieval.

Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.