Performance Gap in Entity Knowledge Extraction Across Modalities in Vision Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel at extracting and reasoning about information from images.Yet, their capacity to leverage internal knowledge about specific entities remains underexplored.This work investigates the disparity in model performance when answering factual questions about an entity described in text versus depicted in an image.Our results reveal a significant accuracy drop -reaching 18% for some models -when the entity is presented visually instead of textually.To study this gap we present POPVQA, a dataset which allows separating entity recognition and question answering, and use it to benchmark several models.We hypothesize that this decline arises from limitations in how information flows from image tokens to query tokens.Thus, we use mechanistic interpretability tools to reveal that, although image tokens are preprocessed by the vision encoder, meaningful information flow from these tokens occurs only in the much deeper layers.Furthermore, critical image processing happens in the language model's middle layers, allowing few layers for consecutive reasoning, highlighting a potential inefficiency in how the model utilizes its layers for reasoning.These insights shed light on the internal mechanics of VLMs and offer pathways for enhancing their reasoning capabilities.POPVQA can be found at this link.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1411
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Gap in Entity Knowledge Extraction Across Modalities in Vision Language Models

Mor Geva, Raja Giryes, I. Bernard Cohen, Daniela Gottesman
1 citations
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
1.28
article

Performance Gap in Entity Knowledge Extraction Across Modalities in Vision Language Models

Mor Geva, Raja Giryes, I. Bernard Cohen, Daniela Gottesman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel at extracting and reasoning about information from images.Yet, their capacity to leverage internal knowledge about specific entities remains underexplored.This work investigates the disparity in model performance when answering factual questions about an entity described in text versus depicted in an image.Our results reveal a significant accuracy drop -reaching 18% for some models -when the entity is presented visually instead of textually.To study this gap we present POPVQA, a dataset which allows separating entity recognition and question answering, and use it to benchmark several models.We hypothesize that this decline arises from limitations in how information flows from image tokens to query tokens.Thus, we use mechanistic interpretability tools to reveal that, although image tokens are preprocessed by the vision encoder, meaningful information flow from these tokens occurs only in the much deeper layers.Furthermore, critical image processing happens in the language model's middle layers, allowing few layers for consecutive reasoning, highlighting a potential inefficiency in how the model utilizes its layers for reasoning.These insights shed light on the internal mechanics of VLMs and offer pathways for enhancing their reasoning capabilities.POPVQA can be found at this link.

Tel Aviv University (IL)
Tel Aviv University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.