Representations of Fact, Fiction and Forecast in Large Language Models: Epistemics and Attitudes

Rational speakers are supposed to know what they know and what they do not know, and to generate expressions matching the strength of evidence.In contrast, it is still a challenge for current large language models to generate corresponding utterances based on the assessment of facts and confidence in an uncertain real-world environment.While it has recently become popular to estimate and calibrate confidence of LLMs with verbalized uncertainty, what is lacking is a careful examination of the linguistic knowledge of uncertainty encoded in the latent space of LLMs.In this paper, we draw on typological frameworks of epistemic expressions to evaluate LLMs' knowledge of epistemic modality, using controlled stories.Our experiments show that the performance of LLMs in generating epistemic expressions is limited and not robust, and hence the expressions of uncertainty generated by LLMs are not always reliable.To build uncertainty-aware LLMs, it is necessary to enrich the semantic knowledge of epistemic modality in LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1345
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representations of Fact, Fiction and Forecast in Large Language Models: Epistemics and Attitudes

David Schlangen, Meng Li, Michael Vrazitulis
Topic Modeling
article

Representations of Fact, Fiction and Forecast in Large Language Models: Epistemics and Attitudes

David Schlangen, Meng Li, Michael Vrazitulis
article en

Abstract

Rational speakers are supposed to know what they know and what they do not know, and to generate expressions matching the strength of evidence.In contrast, it is still a challenge for current large language models to generate corresponding utterances based on the assessment of facts and confidence in an uncertain real-world environment.While it has recently become popular to estimate and calibrate confidence of LLMs with verbalized uncertainty, what is lacking is a careful examination of the linguistic knowledge of uncertainty encoded in the latent space of LLMs.In this paper, we draw on typological frameworks of epistemic expressions to evaluate LLMs' knowledge of epistemic modality, using controlled stories.Our experiments show that the performance of LLMs in generating epistemic expressions is limited and not robust, and hence the expressions of uncertainty generated by LLMs are not always reliable.To build uncertainty-aware LLMs, it is necessary to enrich the semantic knowledge of epistemic modality in LLMs.

University of Potsdam (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.