Leveraging Human Production-Interpretation Asymmetries to Test LLM Cognitive Plausibility

Whether large language models (LLMs) process language similarly to humans has been the subject of much theoretical and practical debate.We examine this question through the lens of the production-interpretation distinction found in human sentence processing and evaluate the extent to which instruction-tuned LLMs replicate this distinction.Using an empirically documented asymmetry between pronoun production and interpretation in humans for implicit causality verbs as a testbed, we find that some LLMs do quantitatively and qualitatively reflect human-like asymmetries between production and interpretation.We demonstrate that whether this behavior holds depends upon both model size-with larger models more likely to reflect human-like patterns and the choice of meta-linguistic prompts used to elicit the behavior.Our codes and results are available here.