The Role of Abstract Representations and Observed Preferences in the Ordering of Binomials in Large Language Models

To what extent do large language models learn abstract representations as opposed to more superficial aspects of their very large training corpora?We examine this question in the context of binomial ordering preferences involving two conjoined nouns in English.When choosing a binomial ordering (radio and television vs television and radio), humans rely on more than simply the observed frequency of each option.Humans also rely on abstract ordering preferences (e.g., preferences for short words before long words).We investigate whether large language models simply rely on the observed preference in their training data, or whether they are capable of learning the abstract ordering preferences (i.e., abstract representations) that humans rely on.Our results suggest that both smaller and larger models' ordering preferences are driven exclusively by their experience with that item in the training data.Our study provides further insights into differences between how large language models represent and use language and how humans do it, particularly with respect to the use of abstract representations versus observed preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-short.55
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Abstract Representations and Observed Preferences in the Ordering of Binomials in Large Language Models

Zachary N. Houghton, Emily Morgan, Kenji Sagae
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

The Role of Abstract Representations and Observed Preferences in the Ordering of Binomials in Large Language Models

Zachary N. Houghton, Emily Morgan, Kenji Sagae
article en

Abstract

To what extent do large language models learn abstract representations as opposed to more superficial aspects of their very large training corpora?We examine this question in the context of binomial ordering preferences involving two conjoined nouns in English.When choosing a binomial ordering (radio and television vs television and radio), humans rely on more than simply the observed frequency of each option.Humans also rely on abstract ordering preferences (e.g., preferences for short words before long words).We investigate whether large language models simply rely on the observed preference in their training data, or whether they are capable of learning the abstract ordering preferences (i.e., abstract representations) that humans rely on.Our results suggest that both smaller and larger models' ordering preferences are driven exclusively by their experience with that item in the training data.Our study provides further insights into differences between how large language models represent and use language and how humans do it, particularly with respect to the use of abstract representations versus observed preferences.

University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Abstract Representations and Observed Preferences in the Ordering of Binomials in Large Language Models — Zachary N. Houghton, Emily Morgan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS